Pelvic Exenteration: An Ultimate Option in Advanced Gynecological Malignancies—A Single Center Experience

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Pelvic exenteration (PE) might be a curative option for patients with advanced pelvic malignancies. Due to its significant morbidity and mortality rates, PE necessitates meticulous patient selection, and a comprehensive understanding of disease spread. This study outlines the experience at a single tertiary referral center and investigates prognostic factors influencing survival post-PE, thereby guiding clinical decision-making processes. <b>Methods</b>: Patients undergoing PE for advanced pelvic gynecological malignancies between 01/2016 and 12/2023 were retrospectively analyzed using a prospectively managed database. Eligibility for PE was determined through individualized tumor board evaluations based on CT/MRI imaging, excluding patients with distant metastases. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics, operative details, complication rates, and histopathological findings were assessed using univariate and multivariate regression analyses. Disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Poor outcome prognostic factors were identified, outlining an optimal candidate profile for PE. <b>Results</b>: A total of 70 patients were included. The median age was 54.5 years. Forty-three patients (61.4%) presented with recurrent disease and the majority were diagnosed with cervical cancer (n = 48, 68.6%). Total PE was performed in 40 patients (57.1%), with complete tumor resection achieved in 68.6% of patients (n = 48). Sixteen patients (22.8%) experienced grade IV/V complications. Median DFS and OS were 8.2 and 16.4 months, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified R1 resection status and para-aortic lymph node involvement as independent negative prognostic factors. <b>Conclusions</b>: PE is a viable option for selected patients with advanced primary and recurrent pelvic gynecological malignancies. When complete tumor resection is feasible, patients may derive benefit from PE, although the risk of severe perioperative complications must be carefully evaluated.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancers
Published
2025-07-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17142327
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.09
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pelvic Exenteration: An Ultimate Option in Advanced Gynecological Malignancies—A Single Center Experience

Jalid Sehouli, Ahmad Sayasneh, Jan Philipp Ramspott, Ibrahim Büdeyri et al.
2 citations
Cancers
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
2.09
article

Pelvic Exenteration: An Ultimate Option in Advanced Gynecological Malignancies—A Single Center Experience

Jalid Sehouli, Ahmad Sayasneh, Jan Philipp Ramspott, Ibrahim Büdeyri, Helmut Plett, Andrea Miranda
article en
2 citations

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Pelvic exenteration (PE) might be a curative option for patients with advanced pelvic malignancies. Due to its significant morbidity and mortality rates, PE necessitates meticulous patient selection, and a comprehensive understanding of disease spread. This study outlines the experience at a single tertiary referral center and investigates prognostic factors influencing survival post-PE, thereby guiding clinical decision-making processes. <b>Methods</b>: Patients undergoing PE for advanced pelvic gynecological malignancies between 01/2016 and 12/2023 were retrospectively analyzed using a prospectively managed database. Eligibility for PE was determined through individualized tumor board evaluations based on CT/MRI imaging, excluding patients with distant metastases. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics, operative details, complication rates, and histopathological findings were assessed using univariate and multivariate regression analyses. Disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Poor outcome prognostic factors were identified, outlining an optimal candidate profile for PE. <b>Results</b>: A total of 70 patients were included. The median age was 54.5 years. Forty-three patients (61.4%) presented with recurrent disease and the majority were diagnosed with cervical cancer (n = 48, 68.6%). Total PE was performed in 40 patients (57.1%), with complete tumor resection achieved in 68.6% of patients (n = 48). Sixteen patients (22.8%) experienced grade IV/V complications. Median DFS and OS were 8.2 and 16.4 months, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified R1 resection status and para-aortic lymph node involvement as independent negative prognostic factors. <b>Conclusions</b>: PE is a viable option for selected patients with advanced primary and recurrent pelvic gynecological malignancies. When complete tumor resection is feasible, patients may derive benefit from PE, although the risk of severe perioperative complications must be carefully evaluated.

CancersVol. 17(14)
Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Panasonic (Germany) (DE), University Hospital Münster (DE), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
2.09
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.