Greenhouse gas emissions from livestock production tripled those from household consumption in the Eurasian desert steppe

Abstract Background Family ranches are major sources of livestock-related greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in global pastoral ecosystems. We conducted semi-structured interviews and collected data on livestock production and the livelihoods of 235 family ranches in a desert steppe of Inner Mongolia where intensive pastoral management is practiced. A cradle-to-farmgate life cycle assessment (LCA) was performed with functional units standardized as 1 kg live weight (LW) for beef cattle and meat sheep breeds. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was employed to elucidate the socioeconomic forcing mechanisms on GHG emissions. Results Live weight GHG emission varied substantially by livestock type, descending from cows (59.89 kg CO 2 e/kg) to yearlings (36.32 kg CO 2 e/kg), bulls (22.26 kg CO 2 e/kg), calves (20.92 kg CO 2 e/kg) and meat sheep breeds (19.66 kg CO 2 e/kg), and GHG emissions from livestock production accounted 77.95% of the total GHG emissions of the family ranches, more than three times those from household life consumption (22.05%). Enteric fermentation in livestock was the dominant GHG emission source (68.15%), followed by food consumption (8.58%) and coal combustion (8.13%). Among demographic characteristics, economic status appears the primary factor influencing the total GHG emission. Conclusions Our micro-scale analysis provides insight for addressing GHG mitigation in pastoral systems through coupling the socioeconomic forcing mechanisms on methane emissions. We advocate the use of methane-inhibiting feed additives and shifts toward heating systems that use renewable energy while sustaining pastoral life, offering actionable pathways for low-carbon transition in extensively grazed pastoral systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Processes
Published
2025-07-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13717-025-00627-8
Primary Topic
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Greenhouse gas emissions from livestock production tripled those from household consumption in the Eurasian desert steppe

Xiaoping Xin, Kexin Cao, Tsegaye Gemechu Legesse, Zhuwen Xu et al.
Ecological Processes
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
article

Greenhouse gas emissions from livestock production tripled those from household consumption in the Eurasian desert steppe

Xiaoping Xin, Kexin Cao, Tsegaye Gemechu Legesse, Zhuwen Xu, Yaoqi Zhang, Jiquan Chen, Yun Liu, Lulu Wang, Xinchao Liu, Changliang Shao, Xiaobing Dong, Susie Ruqun Wu
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Family ranches are major sources of livestock-related greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in global pastoral ecosystems. We conducted semi-structured interviews and collected data on livestock production and the livelihoods of 235 family ranches in a desert steppe of Inner Mongolia where intensive pastoral management is practiced. A cradle-to-farmgate life cycle assessment (LCA) was performed with functional units standardized as 1 kg live weight (LW) for beef cattle and meat sheep breeds. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was employed to elucidate the socioeconomic forcing mechanisms on GHG emissions. Results Live weight GHG emission varied substantially by livestock type, descending from cows (59.89 kg CO 2 e/kg) to yearlings (36.32 kg CO 2 e/kg), bulls (22.26 kg CO 2 e/kg), calves (20.92 kg CO 2 e/kg) and meat sheep breeds (19.66 kg CO 2 e/kg), and GHG emissions from livestock production accounted 77.95% of the total GHG emissions of the family ranches, more than three times those from household life consumption (22.05%). Enteric fermentation in livestock was the dominant GHG emission source (68.15%), followed by food consumption (8.58%) and coal combustion (8.13%). Among demographic characteristics, economic status appears the primary factor influencing the total GHG emission. Conclusions Our micro-scale analysis provides insight for addressing GHG mitigation in pastoral systems through coupling the socioeconomic forcing mechanisms on methane emissions. We advocate the use of methane-inhibiting feed additives and shifts toward heating systems that use renewable energy while sustaining pastoral life, offering actionable pathways for low-carbon transition in extensively grazed pastoral systems.

Ecological ProcessesVol. 14(1)
Inner Mongolia University (CN), Inner Mongolia Academy of Agricultural & Animal Husbandry Sciences (CN), Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning (CN), Quality and Reliability (Greece) (GR), Beijing University of Agriculture (CN), Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs (CN), Lanzhou University (CN), Auburn University (US), Michigan State University (US)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, National Key Research and Development Program of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.