Which Companies Go Public via SPACs? The Role of Private Equity and Venture Capital Financing

This study investigates the characteristics and stock market performance of companies merging with special-purpose acquisition companies (SPACs) compared to companies that conducted a traditional IPO in 2020 and 2021. Moreover, it examines the impact of private equity and venture capital funding on the mode of going public and the post-listing performance. Using a sample of 795 companies, the results show no systematic differences between SPAC merger and traditional IPO companies before going public. Both groups were, on average, of low quality in terms of profitability or capital structure. Nevertheless, SPAC targets performed constantly and significantly worse in terms of post-listing stock returns. Over a one-year period after becoming publicly listed, they underperformed the broad market and traditional IPO companies by 45 and 25 percentage points on average. Investor funding per se had no impact on the mode of going public, but companies with more prestigious investors and private equity investors preferred traditional IPOs over SPACs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Review of Corporate Finance
Published
2025-07-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1561/114.00000079
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Private Equity and Venture Capital
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.91
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Which Companies Go Public via SPACs? The Role of Private Equity and Venture Capital Financing

Christopher Hansen
1 citations
Review of Corporate Finance
Private Equity and Venture Capital
3.91
article

Which Companies Go Public via SPACs? The Role of Private Equity and Venture Capital Financing

Christopher Hansen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study investigates the characteristics and stock market performance of companies merging with special-purpose acquisition companies (SPACs) compared to companies that conducted a traditional IPO in 2020 and 2021. Moreover, it examines the impact of private equity and venture capital funding on the mode of going public and the post-listing performance. Using a sample of 795 companies, the results show no systematic differences between SPAC merger and traditional IPO companies before going public. Both groups were, on average, of low quality in terms of profitability or capital structure. Nevertheless, SPAC targets performed constantly and significantly worse in terms of post-listing stock returns. Over a one-year period after becoming publicly listed, they underperformed the broad market and traditional IPO companies by 45 and 25 percentage points on average. Investor funding per se had no impact on the mode of going public, but companies with more prestigious investors and private equity investors preferred traditional IPOs over SPACs.

Review of Corporate FinanceVol. 5(3-4)
University of Luxembourg (LU)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Private Equity and Venture Capital
3.91
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Which Companies Go Public via SPACs? The Role of Private Equity and Venture Capital Financing — Christopher Hansen · Review of Corporate Finance (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS