An Evaluation of Four Radiological Methods for Dental Age Estimation in the Montenegrin Population

<b>Objectives</b>: In this study, we aimed to evaluate the accuracy of four radiological methods for dental age estimation and to test which method is the most reliable in Montenegrin children. <b>Methods</b>: To determine dental age, we examined 351 panoramic radiographs of 190 female and 161 male children between the ages of 6 and 12 using the Demirjian method, Willems method, the European formula, and the BAF. The estimated dental age was compared with the chronological age, and the average, absolute, and standard deviations were calculated. <b>Results</b>: When comparing dental age to chronological age in females, overestimation occurred when using the Demirjian and Willems methods, whereas the European formula and the BAF resulted in underestimations. Only the European formula underestimated dental age in males, while the other three methods caused overestimations in comparison to chronological age. The European formula and the BAF revealed that, when all age groups were included, approximately 57.1-61% of patients deviated from their chronological age by less than six months. When using Demirjian's method, nearly 30-35% of patients had dental ages that were either overestimated or underestimated by more than a year. <b>Conclusions</b>: The most accurate method for estimating the dental age of children under 13 in the Montenegrin population is the European formula. The Demirjian method had the lowest accuracy, whereas that in the BAF and the Willems method was similar.