A Comparability Study Between Intravenous Contrast-Enhanced Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) and Magnetic Resonance Angiography (MRA) on the Post-Treatment Follow-Up of Intracranial Aneurysms: A Single-Center Prospective Cohort Study

<b>Background:</b> MRA is used in our center for monitoring post-treatment residual aneurysmal neck and stent patency. IV CBCT offers better spatial resolution and may provide significant advantages. <b>Objective:</b> This study investigates the image quality of IV CBCT compared to that of MRA for the follow-up of intracranial aneurysms. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> In this prospective cohort study, 97 patients (mean age: 63.1 ± 11.7; 75 women and 22 men) with 114 treated cerebral aneurysms were included from July 2023 to April 2024. All patients underwent IV CBCT and MRA on the same day. Two neurointerventional radiologists assessed image quality using a five-point Likert scale on two separate occasions six weeks apart. Diagnostic values were evaluated across six parameters. Intra-observer and inter-observer agreements were calculated. Subgroup analyses were performed. <b>Results:</b> Overall, IV CBCT and MRA are comparable in terms of their ability to assess parent vessel status and the degree of artifacts (<i>p</i> > 0.05) though MRA shows a slight advantage in evaluating residual aneurysmal neck (<i>p</i> = 0.05). For clipped aneurysms, IV CBCT is superior in assessing residual aneurysmal neck (OR = 16.0, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and parent vessel status (OR = 15.1, <i>p</i> < 0.001) with significantly fewer artifacts (OR > 100, <i>p</i> < 0.001). For aneurysms solely treated with stents, IV CBCT is superior in assessing residual aneurysmal neck (OR > 20, <i>p</i> = 0.002) and parent vessel status (OR > 20, <i>p</i> = 0.002) with significantly fewer artifacts (OR > 20, <i>p</i> = 0.002). IV CBCT outperforms MRA in evaluating stent struts and the vessel wall status of a stented segment when MRA is non-diagnostic. <b>Conclusions:</b> IV CBCT and MRA have their own strengths and roles in the follow-up of post-treatment intracranial aneurysms. Overall, IV CBCT is superior in terms of its assessment of intracranial aneurysms treated solely with stents or surgical clips.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2025-07-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15141774
Primary Topic
Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparability Study Between Intravenous Contrast-Enhanced Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) and Magnetic Resonance Angiography (MRA) on the Post-Treatment Follow-Up of Intracranial Aneurysms: A Single-Center Prospective Cohort Study

Shing Him Liu, Ka Wai Shek, Koel Wei Sum Ko, Neeraj Ramesh Mahboobani et al.
Diagnostics
Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications
article

A Comparability Study Between Intravenous Contrast-Enhanced Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) and Magnetic Resonance Angiography (MRA) on the Post-Treatment Follow-Up of Intracranial Aneurysms: A Single-Center Prospective Cohort Study

Shing Him Liu, Ka Wai Shek, Koel Wei Sum Ko, Neeraj Ramesh Mahboobani, Tak Lap Poon, M. Lee, Nok Lun Chan, Kai‐hung Fung, Wai Lun Poon
article en

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> MRA is used in our center for monitoring post-treatment residual aneurysmal neck and stent patency. IV CBCT offers better spatial resolution and may provide significant advantages. <b>Objective:</b> This study investigates the image quality of IV CBCT compared to that of MRA for the follow-up of intracranial aneurysms. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> In this prospective cohort study, 97 patients (mean age: 63.1 ± 11.7; 75 women and 22 men) with 114 treated cerebral aneurysms were included from July 2023 to April 2024. All patients underwent IV CBCT and MRA on the same day. Two neurointerventional radiologists assessed image quality using a five-point Likert scale on two separate occasions six weeks apart. Diagnostic values were evaluated across six parameters. Intra-observer and inter-observer agreements were calculated. Subgroup analyses were performed. <b>Results:</b> Overall, IV CBCT and MRA are comparable in terms of their ability to assess parent vessel status and the degree of artifacts (<i>p</i> > 0.05) though MRA shows a slight advantage in evaluating residual aneurysmal neck (<i>p</i> = 0.05). For clipped aneurysms, IV CBCT is superior in assessing residual aneurysmal neck (OR = 16.0, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and parent vessel status (OR = 15.1, <i>p</i> < 0.001) with significantly fewer artifacts (OR > 100, <i>p</i> < 0.001). For aneurysms solely treated with stents, IV CBCT is superior in assessing residual aneurysmal neck (OR > 20, <i>p</i> = 0.002) and parent vessel status (OR > 20, <i>p</i> = 0.002) with significantly fewer artifacts (OR > 20, <i>p</i> = 0.002). IV CBCT outperforms MRA in evaluating stent struts and the vessel wall status of a stented segment when MRA is non-diagnostic. <b>Conclusions:</b> IV CBCT and MRA have their own strengths and roles in the follow-up of post-treatment intracranial aneurysms. Overall, IV CBCT is superior in terms of its assessment of intracranial aneurysms treated solely with stents or surgical clips.

DiagnosticsVol. 15(14)
Prince of Wales Hospital (CN), Queen Elizabeth Hospital (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.