Equity focused workshops: Developing a supplementary method to judge the equity of health interventions

Systematic reviews that consider the equity of interventions are an important method. However, this approach can be limited when analyses of inequity for a specific intervention are rare. We aimed to develop and pilot Equity-Focused Workshops (EFWs), a method to supplement evidence synthesis approaches when primary studies do not report data about intervention equity. A workshop protocol was developed with methods experts, focusing on understanding equitable access to interventions between socioeconomic groups. We tested the protocol in three workshops with populations experiencing material disadvantage, using two hypothetical interventions. Data were collected about participants' views of the intervention, including acceptability and accessibility. Data were summarised and reviewed to appraise the utility of the method to judge intervention equity between socioeconomic groups. Seventeen participants discussed numerous reasons why they might find it difficult to engage with the interventions. These barriers were material, non-material, and offered insight into the ways in which interventions may exclude disadvantaged populations. Issues of stigma, professionals' understanding of material difficulties, and the costs incurred by participants using the interventions were highlighted. EFWs can offer preliminary insights into whether health interventions are likely to exclude populations experiencing material disadvantage. There is value in this approach to supplement evidence syntheses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Health Equity
Published
2025-07-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/29944694.2025.2530969
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Health Policy Implementation Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.82

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Equity focused workshops: Developing a supplementary method to judge the equity of health interventions

Barbara Hanratty, Gemma Spiers, Patience Kunonga, Eugenie Evelynne Johnson et al.
1 citations
Journal of Health Equity
Health Policy Implementation Science
2.82
article

Equity focused workshops: Developing a supplementary method to judge the equity of health interventions

Barbara Hanratty, Gemma Spiers, Patience Kunonga, Eugenie Evelynne Johnson, Jane McDermott
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Systematic reviews that consider the equity of interventions are an important method. However, this approach can be limited when analyses of inequity for a specific intervention are rare. We aimed to develop and pilot Equity-Focused Workshops (EFWs), a method to supplement evidence synthesis approaches when primary studies do not report data about intervention equity. A workshop protocol was developed with methods experts, focusing on understanding equitable access to interventions between socioeconomic groups. We tested the protocol in three workshops with populations experiencing material disadvantage, using two hypothetical interventions. Data were collected about participants' views of the intervention, including acceptability and accessibility. Data were summarised and reviewed to appraise the utility of the method to judge intervention equity between socioeconomic groups. Seventeen participants discussed numerous reasons why they might find it difficult to engage with the interventions. These barriers were material, non-material, and offered insight into the ways in which interventions may exclude disadvantaged populations. Issues of stigma, professionals' understanding of material difficulties, and the costs incurred by participants using the interventions were highlighted. EFWs can offer preliminary insights into whether health interventions are likely to exclude populations experiencing material disadvantage. There is value in this approach to supplement evidence syntheses.

Journal of Health EquityVol. 2(1)
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (GB), National Institute for Health and Care Research (GB), NIHR Newcastle Biomedical Research Centre (GB), Newcastle University (GB)
National Institute for Health and Care Research
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Health Policy Implementation Science
2.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.