Allied import options available? Finding friendly trade partners amidst decoupling from China

Abstract The US-China trade war – and broader changes in China’s economy, politics, and relations with the West – have created sharp increases in cost and risk for firms dependent on China. Under what conditions are firms willing and able to decouple from China? We argue that decoupling is only possible where viable alternative markets for sourcing and production are abundant. Geopolitically-aligned markets are particularly appealing amidst rising global tensions. We test this theory looking at product-level imports and show that declines in US imports from China were much larger for products previously sourced from many markets. Requests for suspensions of trade war tariffs are much more common for products that lack alternative markets. Both of these effects are entirely driven by product availability in allied and friendly alternative markets, highlighting firms’ geopolitical concerns in an era of global economic reordering. We conclude that the scope for decoupling is highly variable across industries and depends strongly on political factors: broad decoupling faces many obstacles and will require building alliances and international economic order.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Review of International Organizations
Published
2025-07-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-025-09596-1
Primary Topic
Global trade and economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Allied import options available? Finding friendly trade partners amidst decoupling from China

Iain Osgood, Jieun Lee, Ayse Eldes
The Review of International Organizations
Global trade and economics
article

Allied import options available? Finding friendly trade partners amidst decoupling from China

Iain Osgood, Jieun Lee, Ayse Eldes
article en

Abstract

Abstract The US-China trade war – and broader changes in China’s economy, politics, and relations with the West – have created sharp increases in cost and risk for firms dependent on China. Under what conditions are firms willing and able to decouple from China? We argue that decoupling is only possible where viable alternative markets for sourcing and production are abundant. Geopolitically-aligned markets are particularly appealing amidst rising global tensions. We test this theory looking at product-level imports and show that declines in US imports from China were much larger for products previously sourced from many markets. Requests for suspensions of trade war tariffs are much more common for products that lack alternative markets. Both of these effects are entirely driven by product availability in allied and friendly alternative markets, highlighting firms’ geopolitical concerns in an era of global economic reordering. We conclude that the scope for decoupling is highly variable across industries and depends strongly on political factors: broad decoupling faces many obstacles and will require building alliances and international economic order.

The Review of International Organizations
Princeton University (US), University of Michigan (US), University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Global trade and economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.