Improving the Estimates of County-Level Forest Attributes Using GEDI and Landsat-Derived Auxiliary Information in Fay–Herriot Models

National-scale forest inventories such as the Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) program in the United States are designed to provide data and estimates that meet target precision at the national and state levels. However, such design-based direct estimates are often not accurate at a smaller geographic scale due to the small sample size. Small area estimation (SAE) techniques provide precise estimates at small domains by borrowing strength from remotely sensed auxiliary information. This study combined the FIA direct estimates with gridded mean canopy heights derived from recently published Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) Level 3 data and Landsat data to improve county-level estimates of total and merchantable volume, aboveground biomass, and basal area in the states of Alabama and Mississippi, USA. Compared with the FIA direct estimates, the area-level SAE models reduced root mean square error for all variables of interest. The multi-state SAE models had a mean relative standard error of 0.67. In contrast, single-state models had relative standard errors of 0.54 and 0.59 for Alabama and Mississippi, respectively. Despite GEDI’s limited footprints, this study reveals its potential to reduce direct estimate errors at the sub-state level when combined with Landsat bands through the small area estimation technique.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Remote Sensing
Published
2025-07-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17142407
Primary Topic
Forest ecology and management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Improving the Estimates of County-Level Forest Attributes Using GEDI and Landsat-Derived Auxiliary Information in Fay–Herriot Models

Curtis L. VanderSchaaf, Yun Yang, Krishna Prasad Poudel, Okikiola Michael Alegbeleye
Remote Sensing
Forest ecology and management
article

Improving the Estimates of County-Level Forest Attributes Using GEDI and Landsat-Derived Auxiliary Information in Fay–Herriot Models

Curtis L. VanderSchaaf, Yun Yang, Krishna Prasad Poudel, Okikiola Michael Alegbeleye
article en

Abstract

National-scale forest inventories such as the Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) program in the United States are designed to provide data and estimates that meet target precision at the national and state levels. However, such design-based direct estimates are often not accurate at a smaller geographic scale due to the small sample size. Small area estimation (SAE) techniques provide precise estimates at small domains by borrowing strength from remotely sensed auxiliary information. This study combined the FIA direct estimates with gridded mean canopy heights derived from recently published Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) Level 3 data and Landsat data to improve county-level estimates of total and merchantable volume, aboveground biomass, and basal area in the states of Alabama and Mississippi, USA. Compared with the FIA direct estimates, the area-level SAE models reduced root mean square error for all variables of interest. The multi-state SAE models had a mean relative standard error of 0.67. In contrast, single-state models had relative standard errors of 0.54 and 0.59 for Alabama and Mississippi, respectively. Despite GEDI’s limited footprints, this study reveals its potential to reduce direct estimate errors at the sub-state level when combined with Landsat bands through the small area estimation technique.

Remote SensingVol. 17(14)
Cornell University (US), New York State College of Agriculture & Life Sciences (US), Washington State University (US), Mississippi State University (US)
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Mississippi State University, National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Forest ecology and management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.