The Effect of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) Versus Foam Roller as Recovery Modalities on Muscular Power Output

This research aimed to determine and compare the effect of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) versus foam rolling on muscular power output. Sixteen kayak sprint (n=16) athletes were involved in this research. All the participants underwent both interventions (traditional and modern-technological based methods) on different days. All the participants were required to perform 10 repetitions of squat jump as a pre-test, then 1 minute of body weight squat as a training. After that, participants need to recover using the recovery methods in different session. Then, a post-test was done to compare and determine the results. Descriptive statistics were used to determine the mean and standard deviation and paired T-Test was used to compare the effect of both interventions. Pearson correlation and Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) were used to determine validity and reliability of squat jump test protocol on power development. There were significant differences found in the kinetics and kinematics performance in term of power produced during squat jump (p < 0.05) using foam roller. Both interventions reported high correlation between jump height and force and power produced during squat jump performance; foam roller (p = 0.000, r = 1.00) while TENS (p = 0.000, r = 1.00) but less reliable in foam roller compared to TENS; force (foam roller, ICC = 0.47; TENS, ICC = 0.80) and power (foam roller, ICC = 0.48; TENS, ICC = 0.88). This is probably due to the limitation of participants, the effectiveness of the foam roller and insufficient lack of rest intervals. As a conclusion, foam rollers revealed a significant effect on kinematics and kinetics performance during squat jump and researchers recommended and suggested that foam rollers are more practical due to being affordable and easy to carry. Future research is needed for reliable and accurate markers for performance and recovery.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Jurnal Sains Sukan & Pendidikan Jasmani
Published
2024-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37134/jsspj.vol13.2.1.2024
Primary Topic
Sports and Physical Education Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Effect of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) Versus Foam Roller as Recovery Modalities on Muscular Power Output

3 links
Jurnal Sains Sukan & Pendidikan Jasmani
Sports and Physical Education Research
article

The Effect of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) Versus Foam Roller as Recovery Modalities on Muscular Power Output

article en

Abstract

This research aimed to determine and compare the effect of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) versus foam rolling on muscular power output. Sixteen kayak sprint (n=16) athletes were involved in this research. All the participants underwent both interventions (traditional and modern-technological based methods) on different days. All the participants were required to perform 10 repetitions of squat jump as a pre-test, then 1 minute of body weight squat as a training. After that, participants need to recover using the recovery methods in different session. Then, a post-test was done to compare and determine the results. Descriptive statistics were used to determine the mean and standard deviation and paired T-Test was used to compare the effect of both interventions. Pearson correlation and Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) were used to determine validity and reliability of squat jump test protocol on power development. There were significant differences found in the kinetics and kinematics performance in term of power produced during squat jump (p < 0.05) using foam roller. Both interventions reported high correlation between jump height and force and power produced during squat jump performance; foam roller (p = 0.000, r = 1.00) while TENS (p = 0.000, r = 1.00) but less reliable in foam roller compared to TENS; force (foam roller, ICC = 0.47; TENS, ICC = 0.80) and power (foam roller, ICC = 0.48; TENS, ICC = 0.88). This is probably due to the limitation of participants, the effectiveness of the foam roller and insufficient lack of rest intervals. As a conclusion, foam rollers revealed a significant effect on kinematics and kinetics performance during squat jump and researchers recommended and suggested that foam rollers are more practical due to being affordable and easy to carry. Future research is needed for reliable and accurate markers for performance and recovery.

Jurnal Sains Sukan & Pendidikan Jasmani(13)
Sultan Idris Education University (MY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Sports and Physical Education Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.