Design of discrete PI‐PR <sup>2</sup> controllers for time‐delayed systems using dominant pole placement method

Abstract This paper presents a new controller structure known as the proportional‐integral proportional‐double‐retarded (PI‐PR 2 ) designed for discrete‐time systems with time delay. The dominant pole placement technique, which is frequently encountered in control systems, is used as the primary design method. The design method starts that dominant poles are placed according to the requested performance characteristics of the closed‐loop system (CLS), and the boundary of the other poles are determined as a circle with the help of the dominance coefficient. This boundary is transferred to the parameter plane, and the PIR 2 controller parameter solution set is found. To take advantage of identifying the controller's zero position, the PIR 2 controller is transformed into the PI‐PR 2 controller configuration. The proposed controller method is clarified via a simulation study and a comparison with several PID‐type control methodologies documented in the existing literature.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asian Journal of Control
Published
2025-07-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/asjc.3790
Primary Topic
Advanced Control Systems Design
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Design of discrete PI‐PR 2 controllers for time‐delayed systems using dominant pole placement method

Emre Dinçel, Ayşe Duman Mammadov, Mehmet Turan Söylemez
Asian Journal of Control
Advanced Control Systems Design
article

Design of discrete PI‐PR 2 controllers for time‐delayed systems using dominant pole placement method

Emre Dinçel, Ayşe Duman Mammadov, Mehmet Turan Söylemez
article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper presents a new controller structure known as the proportional‐integral proportional‐double‐retarded (PI‐PR 2 ) designed for discrete‐time systems with time delay. The dominant pole placement technique, which is frequently encountered in control systems, is used as the primary design method. The design method starts that dominant poles are placed according to the requested performance characteristics of the closed‐loop system (CLS), and the boundary of the other poles are determined as a circle with the help of the dominance coefficient. This boundary is transferred to the parameter plane, and the PIR 2 controller parameter solution set is found. To take advantage of identifying the controller's zero position, the PIR 2 controller is transformed into the PI‐PR 2 controller configuration. The proposed controller method is clarified via a simulation study and a comparison with several PID‐type control methodologies documented in the existing literature.

Asian Journal of Control
Istanbul Technical University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Advanced Control Systems Design
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.