On the Relevance of Logic for Artificial Intelligence, and the Promise of Neurosymbolic Learning

In this position paper, we examine some of the assumptions held about logic and its relevance to the development of modern artificial intelligence (AI), which is primarily driven by deep learning. The paper aims to address fundamental misunderstandings about logic and ultimately argue for the benefits of symbolic formalisms in modeling uncertain worlds. While it is now recognized that statistical associations learned from data are limited in their ability to understand the world, there is still a great deal of criticism and hesitancy regarding the use of symbolic logic to achieve or support a broader vision for AI. By arguing that symbolic logic is more flexible than nonexperts believe, we make a case for neurosymbolic AI, which offers the best of both worlds.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neurosymbolic Artificial Intelligence
Published
2025-07-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/29498732251339951
Primary Topic
Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On the Relevance of Logic for Artificial Intelligence, and the Promise of Neurosymbolic Learning

Vaishak Belle
Neurosymbolic Artificial Intelligence
Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms
article

On the Relevance of Logic for Artificial Intelligence, and the Promise of Neurosymbolic Learning

Vaishak Belle
article en

Abstract

In this position paper, we examine some of the assumptions held about logic and its relevance to the development of modern artificial intelligence (AI), which is primarily driven by deep learning. The paper aims to address fundamental misunderstandings about logic and ultimately argue for the benefits of symbolic formalisms in modeling uncertain worlds. While it is now recognized that statistical associations learned from data are limited in their ability to understand the world, there is still a great deal of criticism and hesitancy regarding the use of symbolic logic to achieve or support a broader vision for AI. By arguing that symbolic logic is more flexible than nonexperts believe, we make a case for neurosymbolic AI, which offers the best of both worlds.

Neurosymbolic Artificial IntelligenceVol. 1
University of Edinburgh (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

On the Relevance of Logic for Artificial Intelligence, and the Promise of Neurosymbolic Learning — Vaishak Belle · Neurosymbolic Artificial Intelligence (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS