Intraocular lens stability and factors affecting refractive error following modified Yamane technique without trimmed haptics

PurposeTo evaluate intraocular lens stability and identify factors affecting postoperative refractive errors following modified Yamane sutureless intrascleral fixation without trimmed haptics.Major FindingsForty-four eyes were included: 22 each from Surgeons A and B cases (mean patient age, 66.8 ± 13.7 years). Postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA; logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR]) was also not significantly different: 0.23 ± 0.40 logMAR and 0.22 ± 0.41 logMAR for Surgeons A and B, respectively. Regarding the position of fixated IOLs, postoperative tilt was 6.33 ± 3.8° for Surgeon A, and 5.51 ± 3.17° for Surgeon B. Postoperative decentration was 0.46 ± 0.22 mm for Surgeon A, and 0.49 ± 0.24 mm for Surgeon B. Postoperative refractive error was 0.43 ± 0.75 D (range: -1.00-1.70 D) for Surgeon A and -0.18 ± 1.35 D (range: -3.50-2.20 D) for Surgeon B, showing a slight hyperopic tendency for Surgeon A. Postoperative refractive errors showed a significant positive correlation with postoperative aqueous depth (<i>P</i> = 0.016).ConclusionsRefractive error stability and centration were not inferior to those reported in previous studies. Differences in postoperative refractive error tendencies were observed between the two surgeons, with postoperative aqueous depth being a significant influencing factor.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Ophthalmology
Published
2025-07-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/11206721251357124
Primary Topic
Intraocular Surgery and Lenses
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intraocular lens stability and factors affecting refractive error following modified Yamane technique without trimmed haptics

Hiroshi Aso, Takahiko Hayashi, Satoru Yamagami, Kazunori Fujiwara et al.
European Journal of Ophthalmology
Intraocular Surgery and Lenses
article

Intraocular lens stability and factors affecting refractive error following modified Yamane technique without trimmed haptics

Hiroshi Aso, Takahiko Hayashi, Satoru Yamagami, Kazunori Fujiwara, Tadashiro Saeki, Harumasa Yokota, Sawako Koutari, Kentaro Yuda
article en

Abstract

PurposeTo evaluate intraocular lens stability and identify factors affecting postoperative refractive errors following modified Yamane sutureless intrascleral fixation without trimmed haptics.Major FindingsForty-four eyes were included: 22 each from Surgeons A and B cases (mean patient age, 66.8 ± 13.7 years). Postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA; logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR]) was also not significantly different: 0.23 ± 0.40 logMAR and 0.22 ± 0.41 logMAR for Surgeons A and B, respectively. Regarding the position of fixated IOLs, postoperative tilt was 6.33 ± 3.8° for Surgeon A, and 5.51 ± 3.17° for Surgeon B. Postoperative decentration was 0.46 ± 0.22 mm for Surgeon A, and 0.49 ± 0.24 mm for Surgeon B. Postoperative refractive error was 0.43 ± 0.75 D (range: -1.00-1.70 D) for Surgeon A and -0.18 ± 1.35 D (range: -3.50-2.20 D) for Surgeon B, showing a slight hyperopic tendency for Surgeon A. Postoperative refractive errors showed a significant positive correlation with postoperative aqueous depth (<i>P</i> = 0.016).ConclusionsRefractive error stability and centration were not inferior to those reported in previous studies. Differences in postoperative refractive error tendencies were observed between the two surgeons, with postoperative aqueous depth being a significant influencing factor.

European Journal of OphthalmologyVol. 35(6)
Nihon University (JP), Asahikawa Medical University (JP), Minamiaoyama Eye Clinic (JP), Nihon University Itabashi Hospital (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Intraocular Surgery and Lenses
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.