Measurement of greenhouse gas fluxes in agricultural soils with a flexible, open-design automated system

Abstract. Over the last decades and due to the current climate change situation, the study of the impacts of human activities on climate has reached great importance, with agriculture being one of the main sources of soil greenhouse gas. There are different techniques to quantify the soil gas fluxes, such as micrometeorological techniques or chamber techniques, with the last one being capable of assessing different treatments at the same site. Manual chambers are the most common technique. However, manual chambers are characterized by low sampling frequency; typically, one sample per day is considered to be a high sampling frequency. Therefore, a great deal of effort is required to monitor short-term emission events such as fertilization or rewetting. For this reason, automated chamber systems present an opportunity to improve soil gas flux determination, but their distribution is still scarce due to the cost and challenging technical implementation. The objective of this study was to develop an automated chamber system for agricultural systems and to compare it with a manual chamber system. Moreover, over a period of 1 month, the soil gas fluxes were determined by both systems to compare their capabilities in capturing the temporal variability of soil gas emissions. The automated system reported soil greenhouse gas (GHG) fluxes that were up to 58 % and 40 % greater for CO2 and N2O fluxes compared to the manual chamber system. Additionally, the higher sampling frequency of the automated chamber system allowed us to capture the daily flux variations, resulting in a more accurate estimation of cumulative soil gas emissions. Furthermore, the assessment of various sampling intervals for single-day measurements indicated that between 10:00 and 12:00 LT was the optimal time interval for soil gas sampling in order to obtain representative daily emissions. This study emphasizes the importance of chamber dimension and shape in the development of chamber systems, as well as the sampling frequency and sampling hour for manual chamber systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SOIL
Published
2025-07-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-11-523-2025
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.37

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Measurement of greenhouse gas fluxes in agricultural soils with a flexible, open-design automated system

Jorge Álvaro‐Fuentes, María Alonso‐Ayuso, Samuel Franco‐Luesma, Borja Latorre et al.
2 citations
SOIL
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
2.37
article

Measurement of greenhouse gas fluxes in agricultural soils with a flexible, open-design automated system

Jorge Álvaro‐Fuentes, María Alonso‐Ayuso, Samuel Franco‐Luesma, Borja Latorre, Benjamin Wolf
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract. Over the last decades and due to the current climate change situation, the study of the impacts of human activities on climate has reached great importance, with agriculture being one of the main sources of soil greenhouse gas. There are different techniques to quantify the soil gas fluxes, such as micrometeorological techniques or chamber techniques, with the last one being capable of assessing different treatments at the same site. Manual chambers are the most common technique. However, manual chambers are characterized by low sampling frequency; typically, one sample per day is considered to be a high sampling frequency. Therefore, a great deal of effort is required to monitor short-term emission events such as fertilization or rewetting. For this reason, automated chamber systems present an opportunity to improve soil gas flux determination, but their distribution is still scarce due to the cost and challenging technical implementation. The objective of this study was to develop an automated chamber system for agricultural systems and to compare it with a manual chamber system. Moreover, over a period of 1 month, the soil gas fluxes were determined by both systems to compare their capabilities in capturing the temporal variability of soil gas emissions. The automated system reported soil greenhouse gas (GHG) fluxes that were up to 58 % and 40 % greater for CO2 and N2O fluxes compared to the manual chamber system. Additionally, the higher sampling frequency of the automated chamber system allowed us to capture the daily flux variations, resulting in a more accurate estimation of cumulative soil gas emissions. Furthermore, the assessment of various sampling intervals for single-day measurements indicated that between 10:00 and 12:00 LT was the optimal time interval for soil gas sampling in order to obtain representative daily emissions. This study emphasizes the importance of chamber dimension and shape in the development of chamber systems, as well as the sampling frequency and sampling hour for manual chamber systems.

SOILVol. 11(2)
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (DE), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ES), Technological Institute of Castilla y León (ES), Estación Experimental de Aula Dei (ES)
Gobierno de Aragón, Agencia Estatal de Investigación
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
2.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.