A Comparative Analysis of the Royalty Sharing Rules of the Spotify Digital Music Player Service Channel in Europe and Indonesia

The development of digital technology has transformed the way music is consumed, with streaming platforms such as Spotify, YouTube Music, and Apple Music becoming the primary channels for music distribution. In Indonesia, the use of digital music services continues to grow, creating significant opportunities for the music industry while also presenting challenges related to fair royalty distribution mechanisms. This study aims to conduct a comparative analysis of royalty distribution regulations in digital music streaming services, particularly Spotify, in Europe and Indonesia. This study employs a normative juridical method with a comparative legal approach, analyzing secondary data consisting of legislation, legal documents, court decisions, and relevant literature through a descriptive-analytical framework to compare digital music royalty distribution regulations in Europe and Indonesia. The study shows that royalty distribution regulations in Indonesia, particularly those referring to Government Regulation No. 56 of 2021, still face uncertainties in implementation, especially regarding royalty distribution for independent musicians and digital service providers. Although efforts have been made to manage copyright through the National Collective Management Organization, the mechanisms for royalty collection and distribution are hindered by poor coordination between institutions and a lack of transparency in music usage reports. A comparison with regulations in the European Union indicates that Indonesia needs to adjust its regulations to better align with the complexities of the current digital music market. To establish a fair and transparent royalty distribution system in Indonesia, more comprehensive regulatory improvements and better coordination among relevant institutions are necessary.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
POLICY LAW NOTARY AND REGULATORY ISSUES (POLRI)
Published
2025-05-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55047/polri.v4i2.1720
Primary Topic
FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Analysis of the Royalty Sharing Rules of the Spotify Digital Music Player Service Channel in Europe and Indonesia

I Made Nara Virjana
POLICY LAW NOTARY AND REGULATORY ISSUES (POLRI)
FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
article

A Comparative Analysis of the Royalty Sharing Rules of the Spotify Digital Music Player Service Channel in Europe and Indonesia

I Made Nara Virjana
article en

Abstract

The development of digital technology has transformed the way music is consumed, with streaming platforms such as Spotify, YouTube Music, and Apple Music becoming the primary channels for music distribution. In Indonesia, the use of digital music services continues to grow, creating significant opportunities for the music industry while also presenting challenges related to fair royalty distribution mechanisms. This study aims to conduct a comparative analysis of royalty distribution regulations in digital music streaming services, particularly Spotify, in Europe and Indonesia. This study employs a normative juridical method with a comparative legal approach, analyzing secondary data consisting of legislation, legal documents, court decisions, and relevant literature through a descriptive-analytical framework to compare digital music royalty distribution regulations in Europe and Indonesia. The study shows that royalty distribution regulations in Indonesia, particularly those referring to Government Regulation No. 56 of 2021, still face uncertainties in implementation, especially regarding royalty distribution for independent musicians and digital service providers. Although efforts have been made to manage copyright through the National Collective Management Organization, the mechanisms for royalty collection and distribution are hindered by poor coordination between institutions and a lack of transparency in music usage reports. A comparison with regulations in the European Union indicates that Indonesia needs to adjust its regulations to better align with the complexities of the current digital music market. To establish a fair and transparent royalty distribution system in Indonesia, more comprehensive regulatory improvements and better coordination among relevant institutions are necessary.

POLICY LAW NOTARY AND REGULATORY ISSUES (POLRI)Vol. 4(2)
Universitas Widya Gama Malang (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Comparative Analysis of the Royalty Sharing Rules of the Spotify Digital Music Player Service Channel in Europe and Indonesia — I Made Nara Virjana · POLICY LAW NOTARY AND REGULATORY ISSUES (POLRI) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS