Criminal Liability for Victims of Robbery Who Engage in Emergency Self-Defense

The purpose of this writing is to examine criminal acts that can be classified under forced defense and to analyze the form of criminal liability for victims of robbery who defend themselves in emergency situations. This research applies a normative legal approach, utilizing the study and analysis of literature sources in accordance with primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials, and employing conceptual and legal approach methods. The results of this writing explain that criminal acts can be excluded from punishment if they meet the elements of forced defense as stipulated in Article 49 of the Criminal Code. The victim of the crime of robbery (begal) who defends themselves in an emergency cannot be convicted if the action is carried out proportionally, as a reaction to a real threat to self, honor, or property. The recognition of forced defense as a reason for criminal expungement provides legal protection for victims of crime who are forced to defend themselves. This encourages law enforcement officials to consider aspects of justice, proportionality, and the context of the event in the criminal justice process.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
POLICY LAW NOTARY AND REGULATORY ISSUES (POLRI)
Published
2025-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55047/polri.v4i2.1695
Primary Topic
Torture, Ethics, and Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Criminal Liability for Victims of Robbery Who Engage in Emergency Self-Defense

Dewa Ayu Dwi Purnamasari, A. A. Ngurah Oka Yudistira Darmadi
POLICY LAW NOTARY AND REGULATORY ISSUES (POLRI)
Torture, Ethics, and Law
article

Criminal Liability for Victims of Robbery Who Engage in Emergency Self-Defense

Dewa Ayu Dwi Purnamasari, A. A. Ngurah Oka Yudistira Darmadi
article en

Abstract

The purpose of this writing is to examine criminal acts that can be classified under forced defense and to analyze the form of criminal liability for victims of robbery who defend themselves in emergency situations. This research applies a normative legal approach, utilizing the study and analysis of literature sources in accordance with primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials, and employing conceptual and legal approach methods. The results of this writing explain that criminal acts can be excluded from punishment if they meet the elements of forced defense as stipulated in Article 49 of the Criminal Code. The victim of the crime of robbery (begal) who defends themselves in an emergency cannot be convicted if the action is carried out proportionally, as a reaction to a real threat to self, honor, or property. The recognition of forced defense as a reason for criminal expungement provides legal protection for victims of crime who are forced to defend themselves. This encourages law enforcement officials to consider aspects of justice, proportionality, and the context of the event in the criminal justice process.

POLICY LAW NOTARY AND REGULATORY ISSUES (POLRI)Vol. 4(2)
Udayana University (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Torture, Ethics, and Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Criminal Liability for Victims of Robbery Who Engage in Emergency Self-Defense — Dewa Ayu Dwi Purnamasari, A. A. Ngurah Oka Yudistira Darmadi · POLICY LAW NOTARY AND REGULATORY ISSUES (POLRI) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS