The political economy of in-kind versus cash redistribution in Europe

Abstract Why is the distribution of government spending between cash and in-kind transfers so heterogeneous across European countries? In this paper, we present a theoretical model showing that this difference depends on citizens’ trust in their own political institutions. When citizens do not trust their political institutions, they are more likely to believe that those institutions will waste economic resources while providing public services, reducing their quality. As a response, citizens demand more cash transfers at the expense of fewer in-kind transfers to minimise the quantity of low-quality services they receive. The model also shows that: (i) higher expected income increases the support for in-kind transfers and reduces support for cash transfers; (ii) paternalism increases the support for in-kind transfers over cash transfers; (iii) lower levels of civic capital reduce the demand for cash transfer and, under specific conditions, increase the demand for in-kind transfers. We conclude our analysis by testing our model’s predictions using cross-sectional data for 20 European countries. Our descriptive analysis shows that institutional trust is associated with a higher probability of supporting public investments in training programmes for the unemployed (in-kind transfers) over unemployment benefits (cash transfers). This relationship is larger in countries with higher-quality public services.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Tax and Public Finance
Published
2025-07-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-025-09908-6
Primary Topic
Taxation and Compliance Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The political economy of in-kind versus cash redistribution in Europe

Michele Gubello, Shane M. Dunne
International Tax and Public Finance
Taxation and Compliance Studies
article

The political economy of in-kind versus cash redistribution in Europe

Michele Gubello, Shane M. Dunne
article en

Abstract

Abstract Why is the distribution of government spending between cash and in-kind transfers so heterogeneous across European countries? In this paper, we present a theoretical model showing that this difference depends on citizens’ trust in their own political institutions. When citizens do not trust their political institutions, they are more likely to believe that those institutions will waste economic resources while providing public services, reducing their quality. As a response, citizens demand more cash transfers at the expense of fewer in-kind transfers to minimise the quantity of low-quality services they receive. The model also shows that: (i) higher expected income increases the support for in-kind transfers and reduces support for cash transfers; (ii) paternalism increases the support for in-kind transfers over cash transfers; (iii) lower levels of civic capital reduce the demand for cash transfer and, under specific conditions, increase the demand for in-kind transfers. We conclude our analysis by testing our model’s predictions using cross-sectional data for 20 European countries. Our descriptive analysis shows that institutional trust is associated with a higher probability of supporting public investments in training programmes for the unemployed (in-kind transfers) over unemployment benefits (cash transfers). This relationship is larger in countries with higher-quality public services.

International Tax and Public Finance
Economic and Social Research Institute (IE), Trinity College Dublin (IE), Delft University of Technology (NL)
Irish Research eLibrary
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Taxation and Compliance Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.