Quantifying floodplain denitrification along the middle Mississippi River: novel incubation methods bound denitrification rates and landscape-scale nitrogen mitigation potential

Nitrate removal via microbial denitrification in floodplains is an important ecosystem service that can potentially help mitigate anthropogenic nitrogen inputs from rivers. However, floodplain denitrification estimates can vary by four orders of magnitude, making it difficult to quantify the social value of floodplain nitrogen mitigation potential. Constraining floodplain denitrification rates requires innovative experiments that mimic overland flooding of oxic water vs. infiltration of sometimes anoxic hyporheic waters to bound the rates. We incubated soils of varying textures and corresponding hydraulic connectivity from four field sites across the Dogtooth Bend of the middle Mississippi River, contrasting their varied rates of denitrification using novel deep injection compared to traditional surface delivery of oxic or anoxic river water. Averaged across all soil types, denitrification rates as nitrogen (N) gas production followed an anoxic-injection hierarchy of anoxic deep > anoxic surface > oxic deep > oxic surface treatments. Rates in sand ranged from 101 to 592 mg N/m 2 /day compared to diffusion-limited clay, which ranged from 166 to 448 mg N/m 2 /day. The chemical stoichiometry of nitrate (NO 3 -N) loss to N gain indicated apparent nitrification that replaced approximately 62% of N removed by denitrification even in anoxic treatments, modifying net rates for oxic-surface-injection vs. anoxic-deep-injection treatments to 31 to 176 (sand) and 81 to 162 mg N/m 2 /day (clay), respectively. Combining net denitrification bounds with the daily inundation exceedance probabilities for the 140 km 2 of connected floodplain at Dogtooth Bend indicates, on average, between 70 and 385 tons of N may be removed annually from floodwater during the growing year. While the potential nitrogen removal equates to a small percentage ( ≤ 0.06%) of the river's nitrogen load, economically, the estimated monetary value of N mitigation is worth US$156–$4,106/ha/growing season compared to net profits for soybeans and corn of US$79 and US$88/ha/yr, respectively. Thus, N mitigation across the Dogtooth Bend could rival the agricultural use of floodplain lands.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Freshwater Science
Published
2025-07-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/ffwsc.2025.1577009
Primary Topic
Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantifying floodplain denitrification along the middle Mississippi River: novel incubation methods bound denitrification rates and landscape-scale nitrogen mitigation potential

Stony S. Samberg, Marjorie L. Brooks, Jonathan W.F. Remo, Scott D. Hamilton-Brehm
1 links
Frontiers in Freshwater Science
Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
article

Quantifying floodplain denitrification along the middle Mississippi River: novel incubation methods bound denitrification rates and landscape-scale nitrogen mitigation potential

Stony S. Samberg, Marjorie L. Brooks, Jonathan W.F. Remo, Scott D. Hamilton-Brehm
article en

Abstract

Nitrate removal via microbial denitrification in floodplains is an important ecosystem service that can potentially help mitigate anthropogenic nitrogen inputs from rivers. However, floodplain denitrification estimates can vary by four orders of magnitude, making it difficult to quantify the social value of floodplain nitrogen mitigation potential. Constraining floodplain denitrification rates requires innovative experiments that mimic overland flooding of oxic water vs. infiltration of sometimes anoxic hyporheic waters to bound the rates. We incubated soils of varying textures and corresponding hydraulic connectivity from four field sites across the Dogtooth Bend of the middle Mississippi River, contrasting their varied rates of denitrification using novel deep injection compared to traditional surface delivery of oxic or anoxic river water. Averaged across all soil types, denitrification rates as nitrogen (N) gas production followed an anoxic-injection hierarchy of anoxic deep > anoxic surface > oxic deep > oxic surface treatments. Rates in sand ranged from 101 to 592 mg N/m 2 /day compared to diffusion-limited clay, which ranged from 166 to 448 mg N/m 2 /day. The chemical stoichiometry of nitrate (NO 3 -N) loss to N gain indicated apparent nitrification that replaced approximately 62% of N removed by denitrification even in anoxic treatments, modifying net rates for oxic-surface-injection vs. anoxic-deep-injection treatments to 31 to 176 (sand) and 81 to 162 mg N/m 2 /day (clay), respectively. Combining net denitrification bounds with the daily inundation exceedance probabilities for the 140 km 2 of connected floodplain at Dogtooth Bend indicates, on average, between 70 and 385 tons of N may be removed annually from floodwater during the growing year. While the potential nitrogen removal equates to a small percentage ( ≤ 0.06%) of the river's nitrogen load, economically, the estimated monetary value of N mitigation is worth US$156–$4,106/ha/growing season compared to net profits for soybeans and corn of US$79 and US$88/ha/yr, respectively. Thus, N mitigation across the Dogtooth Bend could rival the agricultural use of floodplain lands.

Frontiers in Freshwater ScienceVol. 3
Southern Illinois University Carbondale (US)
American Rivers, Nature Conservancy
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.