The politics of knowledge use in wastewater management – A systematic literature review

Previous research demonstrates that stakeholders possess diverse knowledge concerning wastewater impacts and appropriate management strategies. Importantly, these different kinds of knowledge are situated in a political context that influences whose knowledge is used to shape local management. While a better understanding of drivers behind the use of knowledge may enable decision-makers to include more stakeholders, a comprehensive review of the state of the literature is still lacking. To address this, this paper systematically reviews gray and peer-reviewed literature published between 1990 and 2023 that explores the politics of knowledge use in wastewater management. The findings show that decision-makers adopt a wide range of management strategies and that various factors influence knowledge use across these strategies. Although there appears to be recognition of the value of more localized and alternative forms of decision-making, local “non-experts” knowledge is still commonly excluded, and decision-making remains strongly driven by legal, scientific, and engineering perspectives. This poses the risk of rendering management initiatives and outcomes less effective due to an ill-fit to local needs or lack of support. It is argued that improving transparency around knowledge use in decision-making, bridging different knowledge systems, and facilitating local decision-making are needed steps forward. Future research should determine how these recommendations can best be adapted to specific contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Environmental Science
Published
2025-07-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2025.1614208
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Water Governance and Infrastructure
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
17.04

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The politics of knowledge use in wastewater management – A systematic literature review

Yim Ming Connie Kwong, Marie L. Fujitani, Roald Niels Christiaan Leeuwerik
2 citations
Frontiers in Environmental Science
Water Governance and Infrastructure
17.04
article

The politics of knowledge use in wastewater management – A systematic literature review

Yim Ming Connie Kwong, Marie L. Fujitani, Roald Niels Christiaan Leeuwerik
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Previous research demonstrates that stakeholders possess diverse knowledge concerning wastewater impacts and appropriate management strategies. Importantly, these different kinds of knowledge are situated in a political context that influences whose knowledge is used to shape local management. While a better understanding of drivers behind the use of knowledge may enable decision-makers to include more stakeholders, a comprehensive review of the state of the literature is still lacking. To address this, this paper systematically reviews gray and peer-reviewed literature published between 1990 and 2023 that explores the politics of knowledge use in wastewater management. The findings show that decision-makers adopt a wide range of management strategies and that various factors influence knowledge use across these strategies. Although there appears to be recognition of the value of more localized and alternative forms of decision-making, local “non-experts” knowledge is still commonly excluded, and decision-making remains strongly driven by legal, scientific, and engineering perspectives. This poses the risk of rendering management initiatives and outcomes less effective due to an ill-fit to local needs or lack of support. It is argued that improving transparency around knowledge use in decision-making, bridging different knowledge systems, and facilitating local decision-making are needed steps forward. Future research should determine how these recommendations can best be adapted to specific contexts.

Frontiers in Environmental ScienceVol. 13
University of Bremen (DE), Leibniz Centre for Tropical Marine Research (DE)
Leibniz-Zentrum für Marine Tropenforschung, Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, Leibniz-Gemeinschaft
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Water Governance and Infrastructure
17.04
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.