Defining Economic and Environmental Typologies across 77 Countries to Prioritize Opportunities for Nonsewered Sanitation

Lack of access to sanitation is a challenge that persists globally, with low sewerage connection rates in many low- and lower-middle-income countries. Engineered nonsewered sanitation (NSS) technologies can meet treatment requirements without sewers, but their relative sustainability varies across potential deployment sites. Here, we characterize the costs and carbon intensity (CI) of three emerging NSS technologies, two community reinvented toilets (CRTs) and one Omni Processor (OP), across 77 countries, identify sustainability performance typologies, and map typology prevalence in countries across the globe. Locality-specific factors such as wages, diet, and material costs drive regional variability in NSS costs by up to 15-fold and CI up to 2-fold within technologies. Across all three NSS technologies and all scenarios evaluated, costs ranged from 0.01 to 0.36 USD·capita<sup>-1</sup>·day<sup>-1</sup> and CIs ranged from 8 to 269 kg CO<sub>2</sub> eq·capita<sup>-1</sup>·year<sup>-1</sup>. Low-cost, low-CI typologies are predominantly in countries with lower human development indices (HDI 2-4), demonstrating alignment between the sanitation need and the NSS opportunity space. Ultimately, the intent of this work is not to imply one-size-fits-all solutions for individual countries; by elucidating key sustainability drivers and defining typologies, this work can support early-stage decision-making for NSS technology research, development, and deployment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2025-07-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5c02064
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Child Nutrition and Water Access
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.48
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Defining Economic and Environmental Typologies across 77 Countries to Prioritize Opportunities for Nonsewered Sanitation

Lewis Stetson Rowles, Jeremy S. Guest, Victoria Morgan, Roland D. Cusick et al.
4 citations
Environmental Science & Technology
Child Nutrition and Water Access
4.48
article

Defining Economic and Environmental Typologies across 77 Countries to Prioritize Opportunities for Nonsewered Sanitation

Lewis Stetson Rowles, Jeremy S. Guest, Victoria Morgan, Roland D. Cusick, Shion Watabe, Hannah A. C. Lohman, Xinyi Zhang, Yalin Li
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Lack of access to sanitation is a challenge that persists globally, with low sewerage connection rates in many low- and lower-middle-income countries. Engineered nonsewered sanitation (NSS) technologies can meet treatment requirements without sewers, but their relative sustainability varies across potential deployment sites. Here, we characterize the costs and carbon intensity (CI) of three emerging NSS technologies, two community reinvented toilets (CRTs) and one Omni Processor (OP), across 77 countries, identify sustainability performance typologies, and map typology prevalence in countries across the globe. Locality-specific factors such as wages, diet, and material costs drive regional variability in NSS costs by up to 15-fold and CI up to 2-fold within technologies. Across all three NSS technologies and all scenarios evaluated, costs ranged from 0.01 to 0.36 USD·capita<sup>-1</sup>·day<sup>-1</sup> and CIs ranged from 8 to 269 kg CO<sub>2</sub> eq·capita<sup>-1</sup>·year<sup>-1</sup>. Low-cost, low-CI typologies are predominantly in countries with lower human development indices (HDI 2-4), demonstrating alignment between the sanitation need and the NSS opportunity space. Ultimately, the intent of this work is not to imply one-size-fits-all solutions for individual countries; by elucidating key sustainability drivers and defining typologies, this work can support early-stage decision-making for NSS technology research, development, and deployment.

Environmental Science & TechnologyVol. 59(29)
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US), University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US), Georgia Southern University (US), Institute for Sustainability (GB), Gratz College (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Child Nutrition and Water Access
4.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.