Characteristic Analysis of Living Lab for the Solution to Community-Specified Social Problems: ‘I City’ Living Lab

Recently, The need for problem-solving through the application of the Living Lab methodology, centered on local governments, is increasing to address social issues. This study aimed to apply the Living Lab methodology to establish a water pipeline management system for 'City I.' When classified by purpose, the Living Lab was identified as a 'technology development of products and services' type. It was further classified as a hybrid type led jointly by research institutions and public institutions. The participants were divided into suppliers, intermediary users, and end users, and it was identified as a 3Ps (Public-Private-People) type Living Lab. The Living Lab process was structured into three stages, and through the process, it was confirmed to be a Living Lab aimed at solving social problems from a broader perspective based on the concept of co-creation. The results of this study suggest that, from a broader perspective, the Living Lab approach can be meaningfully utilized to enhance the applicability of the Living Lab methodology.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-02-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14251/crisisonomy.2025.21.2.41
Primary Topic
Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Characteristic Analysis of Living Lab for the Solution to Community-Specified Social Problems: ‘I City’ Living Lab

Seul Gi Kang
Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
article

Characteristic Analysis of Living Lab for the Solution to Community-Specified Social Problems: ‘I City’ Living Lab

Seul Gi Kang
article en

Abstract

Recently, The need for problem-solving through the application of the Living Lab methodology, centered on local governments, is increasing to address social issues. This study aimed to apply the Living Lab methodology to establish a water pipeline management system for 'City I.' When classified by purpose, the Living Lab was identified as a 'technology development of products and services' type. It was further classified as a hybrid type led jointly by research institutions and public institutions. The participants were divided into suppliers, intermediary users, and end users, and it was identified as a 3Ps (Public-Private-People) type Living Lab. The Living Lab process was structured into three stages, and through the process, it was confirmed to be a Living Lab aimed at solving social problems from a broader perspective based on the concept of co-creation. The results of this study suggest that, from a broader perspective, the Living Lab approach can be meaningfully utilized to enhance the applicability of the Living Lab methodology.

Vol. 21(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Characteristic Analysis of Living Lab for the Solution to Community-Specified Social Problems: ‘I City’ Living Lab — Seul Gi Kang · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS