CFO narcissism and the power of persuasion over analysts: a mixed-methods approach

Abstract We study the role of CFO narcissism in the intent and ability to positively influence sell-side analysts’ perceptions of the firm. Consistent with narcissists casting favorable impressions on others, we find CFO narcissism is associated with overly optimistic analyst valuations. We then study public persuasion attempts by analyzing conference call transcripts and private persuasion attempts through a laboratory study. In the conference call setting, we show that narcissistic CFOs use more persuasive language and are more inclined to call on bearish analysts, both of which we link to price target revisions following the call. In the lab study, we simulate a one-on-one conversation and find that narcissists are especially more likely to use coercive methods to induce higher valuations from analysts. Collectively, we show that narcissistic CFOs use persuasion to favorably influence analysts’ perceptions of firm value.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Review of Accounting Studies
Published
2025-07-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-025-09902-7
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
14.19
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CFO narcissism and the power of persuasion over analysts: a mixed-methods approach

Charles Ham, Mark Piorkowski, Nick Seybert, Sean Wang
6 citations
Review of Accounting Studies
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
14.19
article

CFO narcissism and the power of persuasion over analysts: a mixed-methods approach

Charles Ham, Mark Piorkowski, Nick Seybert, Sean Wang
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Abstract We study the role of CFO narcissism in the intent and ability to positively influence sell-side analysts’ perceptions of the firm. Consistent with narcissists casting favorable impressions on others, we find CFO narcissism is associated with overly optimistic analyst valuations. We then study public persuasion attempts by analyzing conference call transcripts and private persuasion attempts through a laboratory study. In the conference call setting, we show that narcissistic CFOs use more persuasive language and are more inclined to call on bearish analysts, both of which we link to price target revisions following the call. In the lab study, we simulate a one-on-one conversation and find that narcissists are especially more likely to use coercive methods to induce higher valuations from analysts. Collectively, we show that narcissistic CFOs use persuasion to favorably influence analysts’ perceptions of firm value.

Review of Accounting StudiesVol. 30(3)
Southern Methodist University (US), Indiana University Bloomington (US), University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
14.19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

CFO narcissism and the power of persuasion over analysts: a mixed-methods approach — Charles Ham, Mark Piorkowski, et al. · Review of Accounting Studies (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS