From Squid Game to Organizational Governance: A Neurobehavioral Framework of Four Leadership Archetypes

This paper presents a multidisciplinary framework integrating leadership theory, personality psychology, and organizational development models through the lens of narrative structures found in the television series Squid Game. Specifically, it introduces a four-archetype model—Twist, Triangle, Circle, and Square—each representing distinct leadership behaviors and personality orientations. These archetypes are aligned with the Big Five personality dimensions and are mapped across individual, team, and organizational lifecycle stages. The Twist represents innovation and adaptability, the Triangle embodies goal orientation and competition, the Circle reflects empathy and collaboration, and the Square stands for structure and consistency. Each archetype is examined in terms of its strengths, limitations, and optimal fit within particular phases of organizational evolution—from startup and rapid growth to maturity and bureaucratic consolidation. Empirical support is drawn from behavioral leadership theories, neurobehavioral data, and case studies of corporate development. Through this analysis, the paper explores how mismatches between leadership archetypes and organizational stages can lead to dysfunction, stagnation, or failure. Conversely, alignment between archetype and context contributes to sustainable performance and team cohesion. The framework offers practical applications in leadership development, succession planning, and cultural diagnostics. It also provides a basis for evaluating leadership effectiveness not solely on competencies, but on congruence with an organization’s stage-specific needs. By bridging narrative metaphors with validated psychological models, the study proposes a novel approach to navigating the complexity of modern organizational leadership.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Neurology and Neuroscience
Published
2025-07-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.11648/j.cnn.20250902.11
Primary Topic
Complex Systems and Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Squid Game to Organizational Governance: A Neurobehavioral Framework of Four Leadership Archetypes

Vlad Reznikov
Clinical Neurology and Neuroscience
Complex Systems and Decision Making
article

From Squid Game to Organizational Governance: A Neurobehavioral Framework of Four Leadership Archetypes

Vlad Reznikov
article en

Abstract

This paper presents a multidisciplinary framework integrating leadership theory, personality psychology, and organizational development models through the lens of narrative structures found in the television series Squid Game. Specifically, it introduces a four-archetype model—Twist, Triangle, Circle, and Square—each representing distinct leadership behaviors and personality orientations. These archetypes are aligned with the Big Five personality dimensions and are mapped across individual, team, and organizational lifecycle stages. The Twist represents innovation and adaptability, the Triangle embodies goal orientation and competition, the Circle reflects empathy and collaboration, and the Square stands for structure and consistency. Each archetype is examined in terms of its strengths, limitations, and optimal fit within particular phases of organizational evolution—from startup and rapid growth to maturity and bureaucratic consolidation. Empirical support is drawn from behavioral leadership theories, neurobehavioral data, and case studies of corporate development. Through this analysis, the paper explores how mismatches between leadership archetypes and organizational stages can lead to dysfunction, stagnation, or failure. Conversely, alignment between archetype and context contributes to sustainable performance and team cohesion. The framework offers practical applications in leadership development, succession planning, and cultural diagnostics. It also provides a basis for evaluating leadership effectiveness not solely on competencies, but on congruence with an organization’s stage-specific needs. By bridging narrative metaphors with validated psychological models, the study proposes a novel approach to navigating the complexity of modern organizational leadership.

Clinical Neurology and NeuroscienceVol. 9(2)
Medical Technology and Practice Patterns Institute (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Complex Systems and Decision Making
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.