A Large-Scale Study of Reranker Relevance Feedback at Inference

Neural IR systems often employ a retrieve-and-rerank framework: a bi-encoder retrieves a fixed number of candidates (e.g., =100), which a cross-encoder then reranks.Recent studies have indicated that relevance feedback from the reranker at inference time can improve the recall of the retriever.The approach works by updating the retriever's query representations via a distillation process that aligns it with the reranker's predictions.While a powerful idea, the arguably narrow scope of past studies focusing on a small number of specific domains such as english question answering and entity retrieval has left a gap in our understanding of how well it generalizes.In this paper, we study inference-time reranker relevance feedback extensively across multiple retrieval domains, languages, and modalities, while also investigating aspects such as the performance and latency implications of the number of distillation updates and feedback candidates.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-07-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3726302.3730160
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Topic Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.48
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Large-Scale Study of Reranker Relevance Feedback at Inference

Pradeep Dasigi, Md Arafat Sultan, Arman Cohan, Hannaneh Hajishirzi et al.
1 citations
Topic Modeling
2.48
article

A Large-Scale Study of Reranker Relevance Feedback at Inference

Pradeep Dasigi, Md Arafat Sultan, Arman Cohan, Hannaneh Hajishirzi, Heng Ji, Revanth Gangi Reddy, Avirup Sil
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Neural IR systems often employ a retrieve-and-rerank framework: a bi-encoder retrieves a fixed number of candidates (e.g., =100), which a cross-encoder then reranks.Recent studies have indicated that relevance feedback from the reranker at inference time can improve the recall of the retriever.The approach works by updating the retriever's query representations via a distillation process that aligns it with the reranker's predictions.While a powerful idea, the arguably narrow scope of past studies focusing on a small number of specific domains such as english question answering and entity retrieval has left a gap in our understanding of how well it generalizes.In this paper, we study inference-time reranker relevance feedback extensively across multiple retrieval domains, languages, and modalities, while also investigating aspects such as the performance and latency implications of the number of distillation updates and feedback candidates.

IBM (United States) (US), Yale University (US), Allen Institute (US), Seattle University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Topic Modeling
2.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Large-Scale Study of Reranker Relevance Feedback at Inference — Pradeep Dasigi, Md Arafat Sultan, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS