Measuring Text-Image Retrieval Fairness with Synthetic Data

In this paper, we study social bias in cross-modal text-image retrieval systems, focusing on the interaction between textual queries and image responses. Despite the significant advancements in cross-modal retrieval models, the potential for social bias in their responses remains a pressing concern, necessitating a comprehensive framework for assessment and mitigation. We introduce a novel framework for evaluating social bias in cross-modal retrieval systems, leveraging a new dataset and appropriate metrics specifically designed for this purpose. Our dataset, Social Inclusive Synthetic Professionals Images (SISPI), comprises 49K images generated using state-of-the-art text-to-image models, ensuring a balanced representation of demographic groups across various professional roles. We use this dataset to conduct an extensive analysis of social bias (gender and ethnic) in state of the art cross-modal retrieval deep models, including CLIP, ALIGN, BLIP, FLAVA, COCA, and many others. Using diversity metrics, grounded in the distribution of different demographic groups' images in the retrieval rankings, we provide a quantitative measure of fairness, facilitating a detailed analysis of models' behavior. Our work sheds light on biases present in current cross-modal retrieval systems and emphasizes the importance of training data curation, providing a foundation for future research and development towards more equitable and unbiased models. The dataset and code of our framework is publicly available at https://sispi-benchmark.github.io/sispi-benchmark/.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-07-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3726302.3730030
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.28

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Measuring Text-Image Retrieval Fairness with Synthetic Data

Lluís Gómez
1 citations
Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
1.28
article

Measuring Text-Image Retrieval Fairness with Synthetic Data

Lluís Gómez
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In this paper, we study social bias in cross-modal text-image retrieval systems, focusing on the interaction between textual queries and image responses. Despite the significant advancements in cross-modal retrieval models, the potential for social bias in their responses remains a pressing concern, necessitating a comprehensive framework for assessment and mitigation. We introduce a novel framework for evaluating social bias in cross-modal retrieval systems, leveraging a new dataset and appropriate metrics specifically designed for this purpose. Our dataset, Social Inclusive Synthetic Professionals Images (SISPI), comprises 49K images generated using state-of-the-art text-to-image models, ensuring a balanced representation of demographic groups across various professional roles. We use this dataset to conduct an extensive analysis of social bias (gender and ethnic) in state of the art cross-modal retrieval deep models, including CLIP, ALIGN, BLIP, FLAVA, COCA, and many others. Using diversity metrics, grounded in the distribution of different demographic groups' images in the retrieval rankings, we provide a quantitative measure of fairness, facilitating a detailed analysis of models' behavior. Our work sheds light on biases present in current cross-modal retrieval systems and emphasizes the importance of training data curation, providing a foundation for future research and development towards more equitable and unbiased models. The dataset and code of our framework is publicly available at https://sispi-benchmark.github.io/sispi-benchmark/.

Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES)
Agencia Estatal de Investigación
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
1.28
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.