Probabilistic Thinking Process in Probability Problem-Solving Prospective Mathematics Teacher with Field-Independent based on Polya's Three Stages

Background/purpose. This study investigates the probabilistic thinking process in solving probability problems by prospective mathematics teachers with a field-independent cognitive style. The objective is to explore how individuals with this cognitive style approach problem-solving based on the three stages of Polya’s framework: understanding the problem, devising a plan, and carrying out the plan. Materials/Methods. A descriptive qualitative approach with a case study design was employed. The participant was a female student enrolled in the Mathematics Education Program at the Universitas Sembilanbelas November Kolaka, identified as having a field-independent cognitive style through the Group Embedded Figures Test (GEFT). The research instruments included a probability problem-solving task constructed based on indicators of probabilistic thinking and Polya’s stages, along with semi-structured interview guidelines. Data were collected through task-based problem-solving and interviews, and were analyzed using data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing. Results. The participant demonstrated a systematic probabilistic thinking process across all three stages. During the problem-understanding phase, she successfully identified known and unknown information and accurately interpreted mathematical symbols. In the planning phase, she applied deductive reasoning to develop appropriate strategies. In the execution phase, she implemented the procedures precisely and arrived at logical conclusions. Conclusion. The findings suggest that solving binomial distribution problems requires more than procedural knowledge; it also involves conceptual understanding, logical reasoning, and the capacity to manage uncertainty. Prospective mathematics teachers with a field-independent cognitive style exhibit strong potential in integrating structured probabilistic thinking with Polya’s problem-solving stages.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Educational Process International Journal
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2025.17.333
Primary Topic
Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Probabilistic Thinking Process in Probability Problem-Solving Prospective Mathematics Teacher with Field-Independent based on Polya's Three Stages

Endah Budi Rahaju, I Ketut Budayasa, Supratman Supratman
Educational Process International Journal
Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
article

Probabilistic Thinking Process in Probability Problem-Solving Prospective Mathematics Teacher with Field-Independent based on Polya's Three Stages

Endah Budi Rahaju, I Ketut Budayasa, Supratman Supratman
article en

Abstract

Background/purpose. This study investigates the probabilistic thinking process in solving probability problems by prospective mathematics teachers with a field-independent cognitive style. The objective is to explore how individuals with this cognitive style approach problem-solving based on the three stages of Polya’s framework: understanding the problem, devising a plan, and carrying out the plan. Materials/Methods. A descriptive qualitative approach with a case study design was employed. The participant was a female student enrolled in the Mathematics Education Program at the Universitas Sembilanbelas November Kolaka, identified as having a field-independent cognitive style through the Group Embedded Figures Test (GEFT). The research instruments included a probability problem-solving task constructed based on indicators of probabilistic thinking and Polya’s stages, along with semi-structured interview guidelines. Data were collected through task-based problem-solving and interviews, and were analyzed using data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing. Results. The participant demonstrated a systematic probabilistic thinking process across all three stages. During the problem-understanding phase, she successfully identified known and unknown information and accurately interpreted mathematical symbols. In the planning phase, she applied deductive reasoning to develop appropriate strategies. In the execution phase, she implemented the procedures precisely and arrived at logical conclusions. Conclusion. The findings suggest that solving binomial distribution problems requires more than procedural knowledge; it also involves conceptual understanding, logical reasoning, and the capacity to manage uncertainty. Prospective mathematics teachers with a field-independent cognitive style exhibit strong potential in integrating structured probabilistic thinking with Polya’s problem-solving stages.

Educational Process International JournalVol. 17(1)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.