Applying Design Thinking to identify strategies for enacting evidence-based policymaking supporting Standard Time

Design Thinking is an under-explored but effective tool for uncovering potential barriers and brainstorming approaches for engendering support of evidence-based pST legislation. Statement of Significance The transition from Standard Time to Daylight Saving Time is associated with health, safety, economic, and other concerns. There is broad public support to "do away" with the clock change, but legislative efforts have proposed permanent Daylight Savings Time, which is contrary to medical and scientific society recommendations. There is an urgent need to garner public support for evidence-based clock time legislation, which would be for permanent Standard Time. We employed Design Thinking methodology with a multidisciplinary group of stakeholders, including sleep/circadian rhythms researchers, design experts, and policymakers. The results of the Design Thinking activities illuminated themes relating to the barriers to evidence-based clock time legislation, and opportunities for designing evidence-based slogans and messages.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SLEEP
Published
2025-07-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsaf193
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Behavioral Health and Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.54
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Applying Design Thinking to identify strategies for enacting evidence-based policymaking supporting Standard Time

Karin G. Johnson, Rebecca Robbins, Dieter Reuther, Matthew D. Weaver et al.
1 citations
SLEEP
Behavioral Health and Interventions
1.54
article

Applying Design Thinking to identify strategies for enacting evidence-based policymaking supporting Standard Time

Karin G. Johnson, Rebecca Robbins, Dieter Reuther, Matthew D. Weaver, Joseph M. Dzierzewski, Elizabeth B. Klerman, Lauren Hale, Osea Giuntella, Chidera Ejikeme, Wendy Troxel, Beth A. Malow, Terra Ziporyn, Shoba Ramanadhan, Christopher M. Barnes, Charles Andrew Czeisler, Mark R. Rosekind, Karen Korellis Reuther
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Design Thinking is an under-explored but effective tool for uncovering potential barriers and brainstorming approaches for engendering support of evidence-based pST legislation. Statement of Significance The transition from Standard Time to Daylight Saving Time is associated with health, safety, economic, and other concerns. There is broad public support to "do away" with the clock change, but legislative efforts have proposed permanent Daylight Savings Time, which is contrary to medical and scientific society recommendations. There is an urgent need to garner public support for evidence-based clock time legislation, which would be for permanent Standard Time. We employed Design Thinking methodology with a multidisciplinary group of stakeholders, including sleep/circadian rhythms researchers, design experts, and policymakers. The results of the Design Thinking activities illuminated themes relating to the barriers to evidence-based clock time legislation, and opportunities for designing evidence-based slogans and messages.

SLEEPVol. 48(10)
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), RAND Corporation (US), National Transportation Safety Board (US), National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (US), Baystate Medical Center (US), Harvard University (US), University of Pittsburgh (US), University of Washington (US), Mountain View College (US), Harvard University Press (US), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), National Sleep Foundation (US), Stony Brook Medicine (US), Harvard College Observatory (US), Biomedical Research Foundation (US), Community Catalyst (US), Stony Brook University (US), Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US), Parker Hannifin (United States) (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Behavioral Health and Interventions
1.54
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.