Novel Method for Balancing Full Wheatstone Bridge for High-Tolerance Resistive Sensors

Wheatstone bridge (WB) is widely used in precision measurements involving strain gauges and resistive sensors. However, maintaining balance in a full-bridge configuration becomes increasingly challenging in the presence of high-resistance tolerances—especially in printed electronics, where such variations are common. Traditional compensation methods often entail increased circuit complexity, added cost, and additional sources of error. This article proposes a novel balancing technique for fully resistive WBs, leveraging two voltage References to cancel the output offset even in the presence of resistor tolerances exceeding 0.1%. The method demonstrates robust performance with tolerance levels up to 20%, while preserving high linearity. Simulation results confirm that the approach achieves balanced operation and accurate output even with low-tolerance resistors (1%). Relative to the ideal sensitivity of <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$(V_{\text {CC}}-{V}_{\text {EE}})$ </tex-math></inline-formula>, the proposed technique maintains a worst-case sensitivity of <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$0.8~({V}_{\text {CC}}-{V}_{\text {EE}})$ </tex-math></inline-formula>, with a theoretically null output offset under balanced conditions. Furthermore, linearity error remains below 0.5% of the full-scale output (FSO), matching the performance of conventional WB circuits affected by mismatch. While the resolution of the voltage references introduces a small, predictable offset—independent of power supply variations—this error is limited to the resolution of the reference itself. Experimental validation using benchtop instrumentation corroborates the simulation findings: with resistors exhibiting 10% tolerance, the maximum deviation between measured and theoretical outputs was 2.4 mV. This deviation remains negligible in terms of estimating fractional resistance changes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/tim.2025.3586341
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Sensor Technology and Measurement Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.97

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Novel Method for Balancing Full Wheatstone Bridge for High-Tolerance Resistive Sensors

Michela Borghetti, Mauro Serpelloni, Óscar Casas, Emilio Sardini
2 citations
IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement
Sensor Technology and Measurement Systems
2.97
article

Novel Method for Balancing Full Wheatstone Bridge for High-Tolerance Resistive Sensors

Michela Borghetti, Mauro Serpelloni, Óscar Casas, Emilio Sardini
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Wheatstone bridge (WB) is widely used in precision measurements involving strain gauges and resistive sensors. However, maintaining balance in a full-bridge configuration becomes increasingly challenging in the presence of high-resistance tolerances—especially in printed electronics, where such variations are common. Traditional compensation methods often entail increased circuit complexity, added cost, and additional sources of error. This article proposes a novel balancing technique for fully resistive WBs, leveraging two voltage References to cancel the output offset even in the presence of resistor tolerances exceeding 0.1%. The method demonstrates robust performance with tolerance levels up to 20%, while preserving high linearity. Simulation results confirm that the approach achieves balanced operation and accurate output even with low-tolerance resistors (1%). Relative to the ideal sensitivity of <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$(V_{\text {CC}}-{V}_{\text {EE}})$ </tex-math></inline-formula>, the proposed technique maintains a worst-case sensitivity of <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$0.8~({V}_{\text {CC}}-{V}_{\text {EE}})$ </tex-math></inline-formula>, with a theoretically null output offset under balanced conditions. Furthermore, linearity error remains below 0.5% of the full-scale output (FSO), matching the performance of conventional WB circuits affected by mismatch. While the resolution of the voltage references introduces a small, predictable offset—independent of power supply variations—this error is limited to the resolution of the reference itself. Experimental validation using benchtop instrumentation corroborates the simulation findings: with resistors exhibiting 10% tolerance, the maximum deviation between measured and theoretical outputs was 2.4 mV. This deviation remains negligible in terms of estimating fractional resistance changes.

IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and MeasurementVol. 74
University of Brescia (IT), Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (ES)
Agencia Estatal de Investigación
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Sensor Technology and Measurement Systems
2.97
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.