Does the terrain influence running critical power and biomechanics? An in-field study with highly trained trail runners

This study aimed to assess the effects of three flat running surfaces (i.e. athletic track, road, and gravel) on the critical power (CP) parameters and running patterns of highly trained trail runners. Within a two-week timeframe, thirteen male and seven female trail runners underwent three testing sessions to evaluate CP and the work over CP (W'). Each session comprised two time trials of 9 and 3 minutes, separated by a 30-min rest, in which a Stryd running power meter was used to collect the data. The CP and W' were subsequently determined using the inverse of time linear CP model. There were no significant differences in CP across the different surfaces (F<sub>(2,38)</sub>= 1.4; p = 0.253). However, significant differences were found in W' (F<sub>(2,38)</sub>= 3.8; p = 0.032). Specifically, athletes displayed a higher W' on the track compared to gravel (1.8 [0.2 to 3.4] kJ, p = 0.026), and higher, though non-significant, W' on the road compared to gravel (0.9 [-0.7 to 2.5] kJ, p = 0.478). Regarding the running patterns, the athletes displayed lower duty factor on the track compared to gravel (-1.1 [-2.2 to -0.1] %; p = 0.030) as well as on the road compared to gravel (-1.1 [-2.0 to -0.1] %; p = 0.019). In conclusion, the CP remained stable across surfaces, whereas W' was reduced on gravel compared to track and road. The differences in W' were accompanied by significant changes in the athletes' running patterns. Specifically, athletes exhibited a lower duty factor on the track and road compared to gravel, resulting in a more aerial running form.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Applied Physiology
Published
2025-07-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-025-05840-z
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.72

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does the terrain influence running critical power and biomechanics? An in-field study with highly trained trail runners

Diego Jaén‐Carrillo, Felipe García‐Pinillos, Santiago A. Ruiz‐Alias
1 citations
European Journal of Applied Physiology
Sports Performance and Training
1.72
article

Does the terrain influence running critical power and biomechanics? An in-field study with highly trained trail runners

Diego Jaén‐Carrillo, Felipe García‐Pinillos, Santiago A. Ruiz‐Alias
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study aimed to assess the effects of three flat running surfaces (i.e. athletic track, road, and gravel) on the critical power (CP) parameters and running patterns of highly trained trail runners. Within a two-week timeframe, thirteen male and seven female trail runners underwent three testing sessions to evaluate CP and the work over CP (W'). Each session comprised two time trials of 9 and 3 minutes, separated by a 30-min rest, in which a Stryd running power meter was used to collect the data. The CP and W' were subsequently determined using the inverse of time linear CP model. There were no significant differences in CP across the different surfaces (F<sub>(2,38)</sub>= 1.4; p = 0.253). However, significant differences were found in W' (F<sub>(2,38)</sub>= 3.8; p = 0.032). Specifically, athletes displayed a higher W' on the track compared to gravel (1.8 [0.2 to 3.4] kJ, p = 0.026), and higher, though non-significant, W' on the road compared to gravel (0.9 [-0.7 to 2.5] kJ, p = 0.478). Regarding the running patterns, the athletes displayed lower duty factor on the track compared to gravel (-1.1 [-2.2 to -0.1] %; p = 0.030) as well as on the road compared to gravel (-1.1 [-2.0 to -0.1] %; p = 0.019). In conclusion, the CP remained stable across surfaces, whereas W' was reduced on gravel compared to track and road. The differences in W' were accompanied by significant changes in the athletes' running patterns. Specifically, athletes exhibited a lower duty factor on the track and road compared to gravel, resulting in a more aerial running form.

European Journal of Applied PhysiologyVol. 126(1)
Universidad de La Frontera (CL), Universidad de Granada (ES), Universität Innsbruck (AT)
Universidad de Granada
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Sports Performance and Training
1.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.