Environmental impacts in the construction of an embankment using the life cycle assessment tool: comparison between crushed and linz-donawitz steel slag aggregates

ABSTRACT The use of industrial co-products as components for civil construction has been a good way to promote a circular economy in the sector. However, this material must be analyzed so it avoids offering future risks. Life cycle assessment is an essential tool to quantify the environmental impact of replacing or integrating new components. Thus, this study aims to compare the potential environmental impacts between a crushed embankment designed with crushed natural aggregate (gravel and clay) and an embankment designed with steel aggregate to replace gravel on the OpenLCA software, which is an open life cycle assessment tool. The carried-out assessment considered the impact of materials and the construction of the embankment (cradle to construction site). Results indicate that using steel aggregates to replace natural aggregates offers environmental advantages for the evaluated proposition as the steel plant lies within up to 243 km from the work site.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Matéria (Rio de Janeiro)
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1590/1517-7076-rmat-2024-0662
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Environmental impacts in the construction of an embankment using the life cycle assessment tool: comparison between crushed and linz-donawitz steel slag aggregates

Taísa Menezes Medina, Diego Corrêa Magalhães, Rudiele Aparecida Schankoski, Julia Cordeiro Zanotelli et al.
1 citations
Matéria (Rio de Janeiro)
Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance
1.01
article

Environmental impacts in the construction of an embankment using the life cycle assessment tool: comparison between crushed and linz-donawitz steel slag aggregates

Taísa Menezes Medina, Diego Corrêa Magalhães, Rudiele Aparecida Schankoski, Julia Cordeiro Zanotelli, Thalya Fortuna Vieira
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT The use of industrial co-products as components for civil construction has been a good way to promote a circular economy in the sector. However, this material must be analyzed so it avoids offering future risks. Life cycle assessment is an essential tool to quantify the environmental impact of replacing or integrating new components. Thus, this study aims to compare the potential environmental impacts between a crushed embankment designed with crushed natural aggregate (gravel and clay) and an embankment designed with steel aggregate to replace gravel on the OpenLCA software, which is an open life cycle assessment tool. The carried-out assessment considered the impact of materials and the construction of the embankment (cradle to construction site). Results indicate that using steel aggregates to replace natural aggregates offers environmental advantages for the evaluated proposition as the steel plant lies within up to 243 km from the work site.

Matéria (Rio de Janeiro)Vol. 30
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (BR), ArcelorMittal (Brazil) (BR), Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance
1.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.