Assessment of Patients Satisfaction and Anesthesia Related Discomfort Between Spinal Anesthesia and General Anesthesia for Cesarean Section

Cesarean section is a commonly performed obstetric procedure, and the choice of anesthesia—general or spinal—plays a crucial role in determining maternal comfort and satisfaction. Evaluating the differences in anesthesia-related discomfort and overall patient satisfaction between the two techniques is essential for optimizing perioperative care. Objective: To determine the frequency of general anesthesia (GA) and spinal anesthesia (SA) use in elective cesarean sections and to compare patient satisfaction and anesthesia-related discomfort between the two techniques. Methods: This quasi-experimental study was conducted at the Anaesthesia Department of National Hospital and Medical Centre, Lahore, Pakistan, from August 2024 to February 2025. A total of 127 women scheduled for elective cesarean section were enrolled and divided into two groups based on the planned anesthesia technique: Group A (GA) and Group B (SA). Patient satisfaction and anesthesia-related discomfort were evaluated 12 hours postoperatively using the Bauer Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire, which includes five Likert-scale questions. Data were collected at discharge and analyzed using SPSS version 25. Independent sample t-tests were used to compare mean scores, with p < 0.05 considered statistically significant. Results: Out of 127 participants, 63% underwent spinal anesthesia and 37% received general anesthesia. The mean discomfort score was significantly higher in the GA group compared to the SA group (4.26 ± 0.71 vs. 3.05 ± 0.82; p<0.001), while the mean satisfaction score was significantly lower in the GA group compared to the SA group (14.19 ± 1.58 vs. 15.26 ± 1.29; p<0.001). Conclusion: Spinal anesthesia was more frequently utilized and yielded significantly higher satisfaction and lower anesthesia-related discomfort compared to general anesthesia in women undergoing elective cesarean section. These findings support the preference for spinal anesthesia to enhance patient-centered outcomes in obstetric care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biological and Clinical Sciences Research Journal
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54112/bcsrj.v6i6.1731
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Pain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of Patients Satisfaction and Anesthesia Related Discomfort Between Spinal Anesthesia and General Anesthesia for Cesarean Section

Faisal Imran, Tanvir Hussain, Fazila Hashmi, Ahmed Zia et al.
Biological and Clinical Sciences Research Journal
Anesthesia and Pain Management
article

Assessment of Patients Satisfaction and Anesthesia Related Discomfort Between Spinal Anesthesia and General Anesthesia for Cesarean Section

Faisal Imran, Tanvir Hussain, Fazila Hashmi, Ahmed Zia, Sami Ur Rehman, Safdar A. Khan
article en

Abstract

Cesarean section is a commonly performed obstetric procedure, and the choice of anesthesia—general or spinal—plays a crucial role in determining maternal comfort and satisfaction. Evaluating the differences in anesthesia-related discomfort and overall patient satisfaction between the two techniques is essential for optimizing perioperative care. Objective: To determine the frequency of general anesthesia (GA) and spinal anesthesia (SA) use in elective cesarean sections and to compare patient satisfaction and anesthesia-related discomfort between the two techniques. Methods: This quasi-experimental study was conducted at the Anaesthesia Department of National Hospital and Medical Centre, Lahore, Pakistan, from August 2024 to February 2025. A total of 127 women scheduled for elective cesarean section were enrolled and divided into two groups based on the planned anesthesia technique: Group A (GA) and Group B (SA). Patient satisfaction and anesthesia-related discomfort were evaluated 12 hours postoperatively using the Bauer Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire, which includes five Likert-scale questions. Data were collected at discharge and analyzed using SPSS version 25. Independent sample t-tests were used to compare mean scores, with p < 0.05 considered statistically significant. Results: Out of 127 participants, 63% underwent spinal anesthesia and 37% received general anesthesia. The mean discomfort score was significantly higher in the GA group compared to the SA group (4.26 ± 0.71 vs. 3.05 ± 0.82; p<0.001), while the mean satisfaction score was significantly lower in the GA group compared to the SA group (14.19 ± 1.58 vs. 15.26 ± 1.29; p<0.001). Conclusion: Spinal anesthesia was more frequently utilized and yielded significantly higher satisfaction and lower anesthesia-related discomfort compared to general anesthesia in women undergoing elective cesarean section. These findings support the preference for spinal anesthesia to enhance patient-centered outcomes in obstetric care.

Biological and Clinical Sciences Research JournalVol. 6(6)
Mayo Hospital (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Anesthesia and Pain Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.