Models Matter: Setting Accurate Privacy Expectations for Local and Central Differential Privacy

Differential privacy is a popular privacy-enhancing technology that has been deployed both by industry and government agencies. Unfortunately, existing explanations of differential privacy fail to set accurate privacy expectations for data subjects, which depend on the choice of deployment model. We design and evaluate new explanations of differential privacy for the local and central models, drawing inspiration from prior work explaining other privacy-enhancing technologies such as encryption. We reflect on the challenges in evaluating explanations and on the tradeoffs between qualitative and quantitative evaluation strategies. These reflections offer guidance for other researchers seeking to design and evaluate explanations of privacy-enhancing technologies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies
Published
2025-07-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.56553/popets-2025-0150
Primary Topic
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Models Matter: Setting Accurate Privacy Expectations for Local and Central Differential Privacy

Priyanka Nanayakkara, Elissa M. Redmiles, Rachel Cummings, Mary Anne Smart et al.
Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
article

Models Matter: Setting Accurate Privacy Expectations for Local and Central Differential Privacy

Priyanka Nanayakkara, Elissa M. Redmiles, Rachel Cummings, Mary Anne Smart, Gabriel Kaptchuk
article en

Abstract

Differential privacy is a popular privacy-enhancing technology that has been deployed both by industry and government agencies. Unfortunately, existing explanations of differential privacy fail to set accurate privacy expectations for data subjects, which depend on the choice of deployment model. We design and evaluate new explanations of differential privacy for the local and central models, drawing inspiration from prior work explaining other privacy-enhancing technologies such as encryption. We reflect on the challenges in evaluating explanations and on the tradeoffs between qualitative and quantitative evaluation strategies. These reflections offer guidance for other researchers seeking to design and evaluate explanations of privacy-enhancing technologies.

Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing TechnologiesVol. 2025(4)
Georgetown University (US), Purdue University West Lafayette (US), Harvard University Press (US), University of Maryland, College Park (US), Columbia University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Models Matter: Setting Accurate Privacy Expectations for Local and Central Differential Privacy — Priyanka Nanayakkara, Elissa M. Redmiles, et al. · Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS