Evaluating the Impact of Generative Artificial Intelligence on Learning Processes in Higher Education: A Quantitative Comparative Study

This study analyzes the impact of generative artificial intelligence (AGI) on learning processes in higher education institutions through a comparative quantitative approach. We worked with two groups of university students: one with access and training in the use of IAG tools, and the other without exposure to these technologies. Standardized tests and perception questionnaires were applied to measure academic performance, autonomy in learning, and conceptual clarity. The results show significant improvements in the experimental group, showing that the IAG can have positive effects if it is used for pedagogical purposes. The study also points to associated risks, such as technological dependence and the uncritical use of AI-generated content.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Posthumanism
Published
2025-07-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63332/joph.v5i7.2959
Primary Topic
Online Learning and Analytics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the Impact of Generative Artificial Intelligence on Learning Processes in Higher Education: A Quantitative Comparative Study

Godofredo Quispe Mamani, Rui Araújo, Iris Jiménez-Pitre
Journal of Posthumanism
Online Learning and Analytics
article

Evaluating the Impact of Generative Artificial Intelligence on Learning Processes in Higher Education: A Quantitative Comparative Study

Godofredo Quispe Mamani, Rui Araújo, Iris Jiménez-Pitre
article en

Abstract

This study analyzes the impact of generative artificial intelligence (AGI) on learning processes in higher education institutions through a comparative quantitative approach. We worked with two groups of university students: one with access and training in the use of IAG tools, and the other without exposure to these technologies. Standardized tests and perception questionnaires were applied to measure academic performance, autonomy in learning, and conceptual clarity. The results show significant improvements in the experimental group, showing that the IAG can have positive effects if it is used for pedagogical purposes. The study also points to associated risks, such as technological dependence and the uncritical use of AI-generated content.

Journal of PosthumanismVol. 5(7)
University of La Guajira (CO), Universidad Nacional del Altiplano (PE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Online Learning and Analytics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.