Sustaining socially just and accurate life sciences teaching for sex, gender, and reproduction?

Abstract For decades experts have called for improving equity in science education regarding sex, gender, and reproduction, with little large‐scale change. To identify potential approaches to change, we convened an interdisciplinary group of biologists, education researchers, and gender and science studies scholars. Our conversations revealed a fundamental need to work across multiple scales, including change within life science classes and simultaneously at larger culture and systems scales in the life sciences and society as a whole. We used the multiple‐loop learning framework to explore solutions across scales: Single‐loop learning is change within existing structures, such as addressing terminology used in teaching; double‐loop learning engages with why a problem exists, such as incorporating the history and philosophy of science into life sciences education; triple‐loop learning questions underlying assumptions, such as shifting life science's culture and norms to value interdisciplinarity; and quadruple‐loop learning involves societal‐level changes, such as working across communities and social change. We argue that cultural changes in the values and norms in the life sciences, educational institutions, and society more broadly are essential for lasting transformation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Natural sciences education
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/nse2.70020
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Sex and Gender in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.64

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sustaining socially just and accurate life sciences teaching for sex, gender, and reproduction?

Ash T. Zemenick, J. Kasi Jackson, Linda Fuselier, Sarah L. Eddy et al.
3 citations
Natural sciences education
Sex and Gender in Healthcare
5.64
article

Sustaining socially just and accurate life sciences teaching for sex, gender, and reproduction?

Ash T. Zemenick, J. Kasi Jackson, Linda Fuselier, Sarah L. Eddy, Kimberly D. Tanner, A. Kelly Lane, Anne Marie Casper, A.G. Lewis, Stacey A. Ritz, Sheron L. Mark, Rhea R. Datta, Karen M. Warkentin, Sara Giordano, Susan Jarosi, Adriana M. Garriga‐Lopez
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract For decades experts have called for improving equity in science education regarding sex, gender, and reproduction, with little large‐scale change. To identify potential approaches to change, we convened an interdisciplinary group of biologists, education researchers, and gender and science studies scholars. Our conversations revealed a fundamental need to work across multiple scales, including change within life science classes and simultaneously at larger culture and systems scales in the life sciences and society as a whole. We used the multiple‐loop learning framework to explore solutions across scales: Single‐loop learning is change within existing structures, such as addressing terminology used in teaching; double‐loop learning engages with why a problem exists, such as incorporating the history and philosophy of science into life sciences education; triple‐loop learning questions underlying assumptions, such as shifting life science's culture and norms to value interdisciplinarity; and quadruple‐loop learning involves societal‐level changes, such as working across communities and social change. We argue that cultural changes in the values and norms in the life sciences, educational institutions, and society more broadly are essential for lasting transformation.

Natural sciences educationVol. 54(2)
Boston University (US), West Virginia University (US), University of Louisville (US), Kennesaw State University (US), Hamilton College (US), University of Michigan (US), Twin Cities Public Television (US), Associated Colleges of the Twin Cities (US), Gender Studies (CZ), University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US), Florida Atlantic University (US), San Francisco State University (US), Colorado State University (US), McMaster University (CA)
National Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Sex and Gender in Healthcare
5.64
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.