Who Gets to Speak When the Roof Is on Fire? Leadership in Political Crisis Communication

ABSTRACT The communication of political leaders towards voters has become increasingly important in modern democracies – even more so during crises. This article addresses the question of which factors influence the presence of heads of government during crisis communication? It assumes that the phase and the pace of a crisis are key influential factors and proposes that leaders are most present during the decision‐making phase of a crisis and during moments of crisis escalation. To test these hypotheses, the article draws on a data set of 436 televised press conferences across nine countries during the early phase of COVID‐19 The panel data analysis shows that leaders' presence increased in the decision‐making phase but is not shaped by the severity of the crisis. This study thus contributes to the literature on political communication and crisis management by focussing on the involvement of political actors. These findings suggest that political leaders strategically choose when to communicate, with their decisions influenced by the phase of the crisis but not by its pace.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Risk Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/rhc3.70012
Primary Topic
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Who Gets to Speak When the Roof Is on Fire? Leadership in Political Crisis Communication

Martin Senn, Lore Hayek, Sarah C. Dingler
Risk Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
article

Who Gets to Speak When the Roof Is on Fire? Leadership in Political Crisis Communication

Martin Senn, Lore Hayek, Sarah C. Dingler
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT The communication of political leaders towards voters has become increasingly important in modern democracies – even more so during crises. This article addresses the question of which factors influence the presence of heads of government during crisis communication? It assumes that the phase and the pace of a crisis are key influential factors and proposes that leaders are most present during the decision‐making phase of a crisis and during moments of crisis escalation. To test these hypotheses, the article draws on a data set of 436 televised press conferences across nine countries during the early phase of COVID‐19 The panel data analysis shows that leaders' presence increased in the decision‐making phase but is not shaped by the severity of the crisis. This study thus contributes to the literature on political communication and crisis management by focussing on the involvement of political actors. These findings suggest that political leaders strategically choose when to communicate, with their decisions influenced by the phase of the crisis but not by its pace.

Risk Hazards & Crisis in Public PolicyVol. 16(3)
Universität Innsbruck (AT)
Austrian Science Fund
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Who Gets to Speak When the Roof Is on Fire? Leadership in Political Crisis Communication — Martin Senn, Lore Hayek, et al. · Risk Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS