Welfare Chauvinism among Voters and Political Parties: Exploring Preferences for Restricting <scp>EU</scp> Migrants' Access to Social Assistance in Switzerland

Abstract The access of EU migrants to social assistance is highly politicised in Switzerland. However, we know little about parties' and voters' positions on this issue across the ideological spectrum. Using quantitative methods, this article examines whether there is congruence between voters' preferences on EU migrants' access to social assistance and those of political parties. It also examines whether citizens' voting choices are influenced by the degree of welfare chauvinism of political parties. The data suggest that voters' preferences do not always coincide with those of the parties, and that voters are more restrictive than parties. Our analyses also show that only voters of the Swiss People's Party and, to a lesser extent, of the Liberal Party choose their party because of its welfare chauvinist position. Therefore, the politicisation of this issue by the centrist and the left parties does not pay off electorally.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Swiss Political Science Review
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.70002
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Social Policy and Reform Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.52

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Welfare Chauvinism among Voters and Political Parties: Exploring Preferences for Restricting EU Migrants' Access to Social Assistance in Switzerland

Angie Gago, Mia Gandenberger, Juliana Chueri
1 citations
Swiss Political Science Review
Social Policy and Reform Studies
8.52
article

Welfare Chauvinism among Voters and Political Parties: Exploring Preferences for Restricting EU Migrants' Access to Social Assistance in Switzerland

Angie Gago, Mia Gandenberger, Juliana Chueri
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract The access of EU migrants to social assistance is highly politicised in Switzerland. However, we know little about parties' and voters' positions on this issue across the ideological spectrum. Using quantitative methods, this article examines whether there is congruence between voters' preferences on EU migrants' access to social assistance and those of political parties. It also examines whether citizens' voting choices are influenced by the degree of welfare chauvinism of political parties. The data suggest that voters' preferences do not always coincide with those of the parties, and that voters are more restrictive than parties. Our analyses also show that only voters of the Swiss People's Party and, to a lesser extent, of the Liberal Party choose their party because of its welfare chauvinist position. Therefore, the politicisation of this issue by the centrist and the left parties does not pay off electorally.

Swiss Political Science ReviewVol. 31(4)
University of Fribourg (CH), University of Neuchâtel (CH), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
National Science Foundation, Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Social Policy and Reform Studies
8.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.