Remnant continuity forests are essential for sustaining epiphytic biodiversity in boreal production forest landscapes

Abstract Boreal forest landscapes are rapidly transformed through expanding clearcutting forestry, leading to a decline in forests with long tree continuity and an increase in even‐aged production stands. The role of remnant forests in supporting biodiversity within production forest landscapes remains poorly understood. Northern Europe provides an ideal setting for studying mosaics of clearcut and remnant continuity forests, given its long history of clearcutting and the prevalence of even‐aged forest stands. New remote‐sensing techniques have enabled the identification of forests in boreal Sweden that have maintained permanent tree cover at least since the 1950s (‘continuity forest’), meaning that they have likely never been clearcut, with removal of all trees. Using these data (including production forest as well as protected forest), we randomly selected 16 areas, each 225 km 2 in size, with the proportion of continuity forest ranging from 2% to 25%. In each study area, we selected four even‐aged production forest stands aged 0–80 years and one selectively harvested (never‐clearcut) production stand aged 81–120 years. As model organisms for assessing biodiversity, we used epiphytic lichens on randomly selected Norway spruce Picea abies trees. We recorded 164 epiphytic lichen taxa on 926 trees. Species richness (including species of conservation concern) in the even‐aged forests <80 years old increased with the proportion continuity forest in the surrounding landscape. In contrast, there was no relationship between the richness of lichens and the proportion continuity forest for the older, selectively harvested production forests. Our results suggest that continuity forests are an important dispersal source for even‐aged production forests since almost all of the epiphytic lichen occurrences represent new colonization. Our results also show that continuity production forests >80 years old are important to epiphytic biodiversity since they host many species of conservation concern. Synthesis and applications . Our study has relevance for forestry and conservation across the boreal biome where a continued rapid expansion of clearcutting into primary forest landscapes is likely. Preserving continuity forests for the future would enrich the epiphytic biodiversity of younger, even‐aged production forests due to their function as dispersal nuclei. The remnant continuity forests are also conservation targets in their own right due to their rich lichen diversity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Applied Ecology
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.70090
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Lichen and fungal ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
21.19

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Remnant continuity forests are essential for sustaining epiphytic biodiversity in boreal production forest landscapes

Fredrik Jönsson, Victor Johansson, Mattias Jonsson, Lena Gustafsson et al.
7 citations
Journal of Applied Ecology
Lichen and fungal ecology
21.19
article

Remnant continuity forests are essential for sustaining epiphytic biodiversity in boreal production forest landscapes

Fredrik Jönsson, Victor Johansson, Mattias Jonsson, Lena Gustafsson, Mari T. Jönsson, Joachim Strengbom, Ulrika Nordin, Jon Andersson
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Abstract Boreal forest landscapes are rapidly transformed through expanding clearcutting forestry, leading to a decline in forests with long tree continuity and an increase in even‐aged production stands. The role of remnant forests in supporting biodiversity within production forest landscapes remains poorly understood. Northern Europe provides an ideal setting for studying mosaics of clearcut and remnant continuity forests, given its long history of clearcutting and the prevalence of even‐aged forest stands. New remote‐sensing techniques have enabled the identification of forests in boreal Sweden that have maintained permanent tree cover at least since the 1950s (‘continuity forest’), meaning that they have likely never been clearcut, with removal of all trees. Using these data (including production forest as well as protected forest), we randomly selected 16 areas, each 225 km 2 in size, with the proportion of continuity forest ranging from 2% to 25%. In each study area, we selected four even‐aged production forest stands aged 0–80 years and one selectively harvested (never‐clearcut) production stand aged 81–120 years. As model organisms for assessing biodiversity, we used epiphytic lichens on randomly selected Norway spruce Picea abies trees. We recorded 164 epiphytic lichen taxa on 926 trees. Species richness (including species of conservation concern) in the even‐aged forests <80 years old increased with the proportion continuity forest in the surrounding landscape. In contrast, there was no relationship between the richness of lichens and the proportion continuity forest for the older, selectively harvested production forests. Our results suggest that continuity forests are an important dispersal source for even‐aged production forests since almost all of the epiphytic lichen occurrences represent new colonization. Our results also show that continuity production forests >80 years old are important to epiphytic biodiversity since they host many species of conservation concern. Synthesis and applications . Our study has relevance for forestry and conservation across the boreal biome where a continued rapid expansion of clearcutting into primary forest landscapes is likely. Preserving continuity forests for the future would enrich the epiphytic biodiversity of younger, even‐aged production forests due to their function as dispersal nuclei. The remnant continuity forests are also conservation targets in their own right due to their rich lichen diversity.

Journal of Applied EcologyVol. 62(8)
Linköping University (SE), Sandviken Hospital (SE), Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SE), Boréa (Sweden) (SE), Swedish Species Information Centre (SE)
Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas, Norges Forskningsråd
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Lichen and fungal ecology
21.19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.