Changing grizzly bear space use and functional connectivity in response to human disturbance in the southern Canadian Rocky Mountains

Abstract Understanding wildlife responses to human disturbance is essential for developing effective conservation and management strategies. Grizzly bears in the southern Canadian Rocky Mountains face increasing habitat alteration from roads, forest harvest, human settlements, and mining, which can alter the way animals move through the landscape. Deleterious effects on genetic exchange, demographic connectivity, and access to key resources can occur if movements are dramatically altered. We used integrated step‐selection functions (iSSF) to model movement and habitat selection for 109 GPS‐collared grizzly bears across an 85,000 km 2 multi‐use landscape in southeastern British Columbia and southwestern Alberta. We then simulated individual grizzly bear movements from fitted iSSFs to predict changes in population‐level space use and functional connectivity under the following scenarios: (1) without current levels of human disturbance, (2) under current conditions, and (3) with a defined increase in human disturbance. Bears avoided crossing highways but were attracted to areas alongside highways in areas with relatively low forage availability at a broad spatial scale, such as in Banff National Park and the Kananaskis region. Females generally avoided moving through towns in spring and summer, while males were more likely to do so. Additional footprints of proposed mines and expanded human settlements in a potential future scenario were predicted to further decrease functional connectivity for grizzly bears on top of prior connectivity losses from existing human disturbance. Our study builds upon existing work simulating animal space use from fitted iSSFs by incorporating individual‐level variation into population‐level simulations and by fitting functional responses that help capture broad‐scale variation in behavior and improve model transferability to new areas. Our results provide insights into grizzly bear movement and connectivity in an area of high conservation importance, and our predictive maps can be used to directly inform transboundary management actions and conservation planning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Conservation Science and Practice
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.70088
Primary Topic
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Changing grizzly bear space use and functional connectivity in response to human disturbance in the southern Canadian Rocky Mountains

Clayton D. Apps, Joseph M. Northrup, Julie W. Turner, Katherine A. Zeller et al.
Conservation Science and Practice
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
article

Changing grizzly bear space use and functional connectivity in response to human disturbance in the southern Canadian Rocky Mountains

Clayton D. Apps, Joseph M. Northrup, Julie W. Turner, Katherine A. Zeller, Eric C. Palm, Clayton T. Lamb, Tal Avgar, Erin L. Landguth, Jesse Whittington, Melanie Dickie, Michael A. Sawaya, Bruce N. McLellan
article en

Abstract

Abstract Understanding wildlife responses to human disturbance is essential for developing effective conservation and management strategies. Grizzly bears in the southern Canadian Rocky Mountains face increasing habitat alteration from roads, forest harvest, human settlements, and mining, which can alter the way animals move through the landscape. Deleterious effects on genetic exchange, demographic connectivity, and access to key resources can occur if movements are dramatically altered. We used integrated step‐selection functions (iSSF) to model movement and habitat selection for 109 GPS‐collared grizzly bears across an 85,000 km 2 multi‐use landscape in southeastern British Columbia and southwestern Alberta. We then simulated individual grizzly bear movements from fitted iSSFs to predict changes in population‐level space use and functional connectivity under the following scenarios: (1) without current levels of human disturbance, (2) under current conditions, and (3) with a defined increase in human disturbance. Bears avoided crossing highways but were attracted to areas alongside highways in areas with relatively low forage availability at a broad spatial scale, such as in Banff National Park and the Kananaskis region. Females generally avoided moving through towns in spring and summer, while males were more likely to do so. Additional footprints of proposed mines and expanded human settlements in a potential future scenario were predicted to further decrease functional connectivity for grizzly bears on top of prior connectivity losses from existing human disturbance. Our study builds upon existing work simulating animal space use from fitted iSSFs by incorporating individual‐level variation into population‐level simulations and by fitting functional responses that help capture broad‐scale variation in behavior and improve model transferability to new areas. Our results provide insights into grizzly bear movement and connectivity in an area of high conservation importance, and our predictive maps can be used to directly inform transboundary management actions and conservation planning.

Conservation Science and PracticeVol. 7(8)
Parks Canada (CA), International Union for Conservation of Nature (Bangladesh) (BD), Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry (CA), University of British Columbia (CA), Kelowna General Hospital (CA), World Wildlife Fund Canada (CA), International Union for Conservation of Nature (United States) (US), Rocky Mountain Research (United States) (US), University of Montana (US)
Wilburforce Foundation, University of Montana, Yellowstone to Yukon Conservation Initiative, Nature Conservancy of Canada, Habitat Conservation Trust Foundation, Rocky Mountain Research Station
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.