Systematic Review of the Use and Modification of the “Trust in Automated Systems Scale”
Subjective trust in automation measurement is used prolifically due to its high availability and practical ease in implementation, and remains close to the state-of-the-art. Yet, it is also easy to violate a validated survey measure by altering components of the measure, such as changing wording, altering the number of items, changing the scale of response, and translating into new languages. An exhaustive review of the Jian et al. scale’s trust in automated systems measure as it was used across 1,480 cited works. More than half altered the scale in ways which, on average, lowered the scale’s internal validity. Increasing the number of modifications further reduced internal validity. Guidance for the future use of subjective scales in trust measurement is provided. We retain hope of encouraging adherence to best practices and enabling continued use of subjective trust measurement in human-centered AI system development efforts.
Authors
- Robert S. Gutzwiller (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2159-8131)
- Rezvan Yousefi
- Jessica Lee (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9255-4375)
- Nathan Tenhundfeld (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6261-5815)
- Apoorva Verma (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0003-5410-354X)
- Tia Larson-Calcano
- Iman Maknojia
Institutions
- Lux Research (United States) (US)
- Arizona State University (US)
- University of Maryland, College Park (US)
- University of Alabama in Huntsville (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
- Published
- 2025-07-13
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1177/10711813251357911
- Citations
- 6
- Primary Topic
- Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 14.63