Integrated Analytical Quality by Design Approach for the Development and Validation of Liquid Chromatography Method for Simulataneous Estimation of Sulfadoxane and Pyrimethamine

This research evaluates a validated chromatographic method for analyzing sulfadoxine and pyrimethamine. A quadratic model was most effective for retention time analysis (p < 0.0001). System suitability met regulatory standards for resolution, theoretical plates, and tailing. The method was validated for assay, linearity, precision, intermediate precision, accuracy, LOD, and LOQ. Assay values were 99.79% (sulfadoxine) and 99.52% (pyrimethamine). Linearity showed strong correlation (r = 0.9996 and 0.9993, respectively). Precision was excellent (%RSD<1), and accuracy fell within 98–102%. LODs were 0.5µg/mL and 0.2µg/mL, while LOQs were 1.9 µg/mL and 0.8µg/mL. The method proved robust under varied conditions and is suitable for concurrent formulation analysis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis Letters
Published
2025-06-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30904/j.jpbmal.2025.4821
Primary Topic
Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrated Analytical Quality by Design Approach for the Development and Validation of Liquid Chromatography Method for Simulataneous Estimation of Sulfadoxane and Pyrimethamine

B Sravanthi, Vijaya Kumar Gampa, Basavaling M Yalagatti
Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis Letters
Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals
article

Integrated Analytical Quality by Design Approach for the Development and Validation of Liquid Chromatography Method for Simulataneous Estimation of Sulfadoxane and Pyrimethamine

B Sravanthi, Vijaya Kumar Gampa, Basavaling M Yalagatti
article en

Abstract

This research evaluates a validated chromatographic method for analyzing sulfadoxine and pyrimethamine. A quadratic model was most effective for retention time analysis (p < 0.0001). System suitability met regulatory standards for resolution, theoretical plates, and tailing. The method was validated for assay, linearity, precision, intermediate precision, accuracy, LOD, and LOQ. Assay values were 99.79% (sulfadoxine) and 99.52% (pyrimethamine). Linearity showed strong correlation (r = 0.9996 and 0.9993, respectively). Precision was excellent (%RSD<1), and accuracy fell within 98–102%. LODs were 0.5µg/mL and 0.2µg/mL, while LOQs were 1.9 µg/mL and 0.8µg/mL. The method proved robust under varied conditions and is suitable for concurrent formulation analysis.

Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis LettersVol. 13(1)
Institute of Management Technology (IN), Institute for Resource Analysis and Policy (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.