A Driver-in-the-Loop Study of Human-AI Joint Replanning

This study investigates human-AI teaming requirements in the context of ill-structured replanning tasks, where evolving goals, ambiguous constraints, and shifting environmental states create coordination demands with AI agents. We conducted a high-fidelity staged world experiment using a driver-in-the-loop simulation, wherein participants completed two event-driven driving scenarios to explore how AI capabilities can aid cognitive work of drivers. These prototypes embodied distinct functionality and coordination strategies grounded in a Flexecution model of replanning. Our analysis draws from post-hoc interviews to evaluate how participants navigated the trade space between the cognitive benefits of AI support and the coordination overhead of engaging with the system. Results reveal that environmental events modulate interaction strategies and suggest design implications for AI teammates that better support human adaptation under varying workload conditions and temporal constraints.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Published
2025-07-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10711813251358791
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Driver-in-the-Loop Study of Human-AI Joint Replanning

Martijn IJtsma, Connor Kannally, Salvatore Hargis
1 citations
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
2.44
article

A Driver-in-the-Loop Study of Human-AI Joint Replanning

Martijn IJtsma, Connor Kannally, Salvatore Hargis
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study investigates human-AI teaming requirements in the context of ill-structured replanning tasks, where evolving goals, ambiguous constraints, and shifting environmental states create coordination demands with AI agents. We conducted a high-fidelity staged world experiment using a driver-in-the-loop simulation, wherein participants completed two event-driven driving scenarios to explore how AI capabilities can aid cognitive work of drivers. These prototypes embodied distinct functionality and coordination strategies grounded in a Flexecution model of replanning. Our analysis draws from post-hoc interviews to evaluate how participants navigated the trade space between the cognitive benefits of AI support and the coordination overhead of engaging with the system. Results reveal that environmental events modulate interaction strategies and suggest design implications for AI teammates that better support human adaptation under varying workload conditions and temporal constraints.

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual MeetingVol. 69(1)
The Ohio State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
2.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.