Board Capture in the Nonprofit Sector? An Exploration of a Possible Cause and Solution

Responsibilities of nonprofit boards of directors include financial oversight and supervision of the CEO. Lack of expertise and the nature of supervision may contribute to board capture, characterized by longer executive tenure despite poor financial performance. We explore whether nonprofit boards are as responsive as for-profit boards to poor CEO financial performance. Our analyses indicate that the boards of the largest nonprofits do not definitively respond to changes in revenues, expenses, savings, or profit in CEO tenure decisions. This contrasts sharply with our for-profit results. However, changes in net assets as a fraction of total assets provoke nonprofit board responses comparable to those of for-profit boards. These findings are consistent with a pattern wherein nonprofit boards provide relatively lax financial oversight most of the time, but act when financial results threaten long-term solvency. Nonprofit boards might consider compensating board members to improve supervision of CEOs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly
Published
2025-07-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08997640251350577
Primary Topic
Corporate Finance and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Board Capture in the Nonprofit Sector? An Exploration of a Possible Cause and Solution

Debra Jones Ringold, Colin Birkhead, Kawika Pierson
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly
Corporate Finance and Governance
article

Board Capture in the Nonprofit Sector? An Exploration of a Possible Cause and Solution

Debra Jones Ringold, Colin Birkhead, Kawika Pierson
article en

Abstract

Responsibilities of nonprofit boards of directors include financial oversight and supervision of the CEO. Lack of expertise and the nature of supervision may contribute to board capture, characterized by longer executive tenure despite poor financial performance. We explore whether nonprofit boards are as responsive as for-profit boards to poor CEO financial performance. Our analyses indicate that the boards of the largest nonprofits do not definitively respond to changes in revenues, expenses, savings, or profit in CEO tenure decisions. This contrasts sharply with our for-profit results. However, changes in net assets as a fraction of total assets provoke nonprofit board responses comparable to those of for-profit boards. These findings are consistent with a pattern wherein nonprofit boards provide relatively lax financial oversight most of the time, but act when financial results threaten long-term solvency. Nonprofit boards might consider compensating board members to improve supervision of CEOs.

Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly
Willamette University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Corporate Finance and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Board Capture in the Nonprofit Sector? An Exploration of a Possible Cause and Solution — Debra Jones Ringold, Colin Birkhead, et al. · Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS