The Impact of Culturally Adaptive Feedback in Information-Interaction Systems on Language-Learning Motivation and Outcomes

Grounded in social-cognitive learning theory and the cross-cultural adaptation framework, this mixed-methods study tests how culturally adaptive feedback (CAF) delivered through an information-interaction system affects university EFL learners’ language-learning motivation and learning outcomes. One hundred and twenty second-year students were randomly allocated to a CAF group and a control group for eight weeks. The quantitative phase employed a 2 (group) × 2 (time) mixed-design ANOVA; the qualitative phase conducted semi-structured interviews with 18 learners, followed by thematic analysis. The findings are as follows: (1) post-test motivation in the CAF group was significantly higher than in the control group, group × time interaction F(1, 118)=15.27, p = .0002, partial η² = .115; (2) the growth rate of learning outcomes in the CAF group significantly surpassed that of the control group, interaction F(1, 118)=12.45, p = .0007, partial η² = .095, end-point Cohen’s d = 2.04; and (3) three high-frequency themes—“enhanced self-efficacy,” “high cultural relevance,” and “increased engagement”—were distilled from the interviews, corroborating the motivation-to-outcome pathway. The study extends the explanatory power of CAF in cross-cultural language learning, demonstrates the motivational amplification generated by culturally contextualised feedback in tandem with self-efficacy, and provides empirical evidence for feedback design in online platforms and classroom practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Educational Theory
Published
2025-07-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.70393/6a6574.333036
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
20.67
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Impact of Culturally Adaptive Feedback in Information-Interaction Systems on Language-Learning Motivation and Outcomes

Xinzhu Li, Li Fang
6 citations
Journal of Educational Theory
Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
20.67
article

The Impact of Culturally Adaptive Feedback in Information-Interaction Systems on Language-Learning Motivation and Outcomes

Xinzhu Li, Li Fang
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Grounded in social-cognitive learning theory and the cross-cultural adaptation framework, this mixed-methods study tests how culturally adaptive feedback (CAF) delivered through an information-interaction system affects university EFL learners’ language-learning motivation and learning outcomes. One hundred and twenty second-year students were randomly allocated to a CAF group and a control group for eight weeks. The quantitative phase employed a 2 (group) × 2 (time) mixed-design ANOVA; the qualitative phase conducted semi-structured interviews with 18 learners, followed by thematic analysis. The findings are as follows: (1) post-test motivation in the CAF group was significantly higher than in the control group, group × time interaction F(1, 118)=15.27, p = .0002, partial η² = .115; (2) the growth rate of learning outcomes in the CAF group significantly surpassed that of the control group, interaction F(1, 118)=12.45, p = .0007, partial η² = .095, end-point Cohen’s d = 2.04; and (3) three high-frequency themes—“enhanced self-efficacy,” “high cultural relevance,” and “increased engagement”—were distilled from the interviews, corroborating the motivation-to-outcome pathway. The study extends the explanatory power of CAF in cross-cultural language learning, demonstrates the motivational amplification generated by culturally contextualised feedback in tandem with self-efficacy, and provides empirical evidence for feedback design in online platforms and classroom practice.

Journal of Educational TheoryVol. 2(1)
Pepperdine University (US), University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
20.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.