Location Selection of Migrating Beetles Under Neutrosophic Model with Sensitivity and Comparative Analysis

Location Selection of Migrating Beetles has different criteria to select the best location. So, multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) is used to deal with different and numerous criteria in this study. This study proposes an MCDM methodology to rank the locations and select the best criterion. The average method is used to compute the criteria weights. The locations are ranked using the root assessment method (RAM). This study uses eight criteria and 20 locations. We use the single valued neutrosophic numbers (SVNNs) to overcome uncertainty and vague information. The RAM methodology is used under the SVNNs. The results show that Availability of Food Sources is the best criterion in this study. The sensitivity analysis is conducted by changing the criteria weights by 8 cases. The results show the ranks of alternatives are stable under 8 different cases. We compare the proposed approach by four neutrosophic methods to show the validation and effectiveness of the proposed approach. The results show the proposed approach is effective and robust compared to other neutrosophic methods.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Neutrosophic Systems with Applications
Published
2025-07-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63689/2993-7159.1284
Primary Topic
Organizational and Employee Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Location Selection of Migrating Beetles Under Neutrosophic Model with Sensitivity and Comparative Analysis

Ahmed A. El-Douh, Darin Shafek, Tareef S. Alkellezli, Rabih Sbera
Neutrosophic Systems with Applications
Organizational and Employee Performance
article

Location Selection of Migrating Beetles Under Neutrosophic Model with Sensitivity and Comparative Analysis

Ahmed A. El-Douh, Darin Shafek, Tareef S. Alkellezli, Rabih Sbera
article en

Abstract

Location Selection of Migrating Beetles has different criteria to select the best location. So, multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) is used to deal with different and numerous criteria in this study. This study proposes an MCDM methodology to rank the locations and select the best criterion. The average method is used to compute the criteria weights. The locations are ranked using the root assessment method (RAM). This study uses eight criteria and 20 locations. We use the single valued neutrosophic numbers (SVNNs) to overcome uncertainty and vague information. The RAM methodology is used under the SVNNs. The results show that Availability of Food Sources is the best criterion in this study. The sensitivity analysis is conducted by changing the criteria weights by 8 cases. The results show the ranks of alternatives are stable under 8 different cases. We compare the proposed approach by four neutrosophic methods to show the validation and effectiveness of the proposed approach. The results show the proposed approach is effective and robust compared to other neutrosophic methods.

Neutrosophic Systems with ApplicationsVol. 25(7)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Organizational and Employee Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Location Selection of Migrating Beetles Under Neutrosophic Model with Sensitivity and Comparative Analysis — Ahmed A. El-Douh, Darin Shafek, et al. · Neutrosophic Systems with Applications (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS