Type-2 Neutrosophic Numbers for Artificial Intelligence Software Choice for Cybersecurity Testing

The choice of artificial intelligence (AI) software for cybersecurity testing is a multi-criteria decision-making approach (MCDM) due to it including different criteria. Evaluation decision making problems include uncertainty and vague information. So, the neutrosophic set is used in this study to overcome this uncertainty and vague information. It has three functions such as truth, indeterminacy, and falsity functions. Type-2 neutrosophic numbers is a type of neutrosophic set that includes nine membership functions. This study uses the average method of computing the criteria weights. The CoCoSo method is used to rank alternatives. Six experts and decision makers created the decision makers using the type-2 neutrosophic numbers. A case study with ten criteria and 15 alternatives is solved in this study. Sensitivity analysis is conducted to show the impact of changing in the parameter on the ranks. The results show the rank of alternatives is stable in different cases. Comparative analysis is conducted in this study. The results show the proposed approach is effective compared to other methods.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Neutrosophic Systems with Applications
Published
2025-07-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63689/2993-7159.1285
Primary Topic
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Type-2 Neutrosophic Numbers for Artificial Intelligence Software Choice for Cybersecurity Testing

Omar M. Akash, Mamdouh M. Gomaa, We’am Adel Talafha
Neutrosophic Systems with Applications
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
article

Type-2 Neutrosophic Numbers for Artificial Intelligence Software Choice for Cybersecurity Testing

Omar M. Akash, Mamdouh M. Gomaa, We’am Adel Talafha
article en

Abstract

The choice of artificial intelligence (AI) software for cybersecurity testing is a multi-criteria decision-making approach (MCDM) due to it including different criteria. Evaluation decision making problems include uncertainty and vague information. So, the neutrosophic set is used in this study to overcome this uncertainty and vague information. It has three functions such as truth, indeterminacy, and falsity functions. Type-2 neutrosophic numbers is a type of neutrosophic set that includes nine membership functions. This study uses the average method of computing the criteria weights. The CoCoSo method is used to rank alternatives. Six experts and decision makers created the decision makers using the type-2 neutrosophic numbers. A case study with ten criteria and 15 alternatives is solved in this study. Sensitivity analysis is conducted to show the impact of changing in the parameter on the ranks. The results show the rank of alternatives is stable in different cases. Comparative analysis is conducted in this study. The results show the proposed approach is effective compared to other methods.

Neutrosophic Systems with ApplicationsVol. 25(7)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.