Cybersecurity Quizzes: A Call for Better Tests

Combatting cyber-attacks relies on the users of the system being properly educated on how to recognize and respond to the attack. Evaluating a user’s cyber awareness knowledge through testing allows for the ability to certify that users are prepared for possible threats they may face online. This study examines the validity of currently available tests of cyber awareness on three criteria: readability, taxonomy type, and relevancy. By using the chosen criteria, the sampled tests can be assessed on whether they are accessible for the average reader, whether the questions require a response that demonstrates the ability to apply the knowledge, and if the questions cover relevant cyber threats. The sampled tests were shown to be mostly above average U.S. reading level. The taxonomy of the test questions was shown to rely mostly on the remembering and understanding dimensions. The content of the tests was shown to overall cover questions pertaining to relevant cyber-attack threats. Readability of the tests was shown to be the most prevalent issue with the currently used tests making accessibility for the average reader a concern.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Published
2025-07-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10711813251357899
Primary Topic
Information and Cyber Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cybersecurity Quizzes: A Call for Better Tests

Mary Lynn Still, Jeremiah D. Still, Benjamin G. Otto
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Information and Cyber Security
article

Cybersecurity Quizzes: A Call for Better Tests

Mary Lynn Still, Jeremiah D. Still, Benjamin G. Otto
article en

Abstract

Combatting cyber-attacks relies on the users of the system being properly educated on how to recognize and respond to the attack. Evaluating a user’s cyber awareness knowledge through testing allows for the ability to certify that users are prepared for possible threats they may face online. This study examines the validity of currently available tests of cyber awareness on three criteria: readability, taxonomy type, and relevancy. By using the chosen criteria, the sampled tests can be assessed on whether they are accessible for the average reader, whether the questions require a response that demonstrates the ability to apply the knowledge, and if the questions cover relevant cyber threats. The sampled tests were shown to be mostly above average U.S. reading level. The taxonomy of the test questions was shown to rely mostly on the remembering and understanding dimensions. The content of the tests was shown to overall cover questions pertaining to relevant cyber-attack threats. Readability of the tests was shown to be the most prevalent issue with the currently used tests making accessibility for the average reader a concern.

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual MeetingVol. 69(1)
Old Dominion University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Information and Cyber Security
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Cybersecurity Quizzes: A Call for Better Tests — Mary Lynn Still, Jeremiah D. Still, et al. · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS