The Legitimacy of Relying on Artificial Intelligence and Its Guidelines in Determining Islamic Legal Rulings: A Jurisprudential Study

This study investigates the legitimacy of relying on Artificial Intelligence (AI) in deriving Islamic legal rulings (fatwas), and outlines the necessary legal, technical, and ethical safeguards. The research poses a central question: Can AI serve as an independent agent of ijtihad (Islamic legal reasoning)? Using descriptive, analytical, and comparative methodologies, the paper examines practical cases such as fatwa chatbots, automated contract systems, and forensic image analysis in Sharia contexts. The findings confirm that AI lacks the qualifications required for legal and moral accountability—such as consciousness, intention, and jurisprudential reasoning—and therefore cannot independently issue fatwas. However, AI can be employed as an auxiliary tool under strict scholarly supervision. The paper concludes with a set of comprehensive guidelines ensuring the integration of AI into Islamic jurisprudence remains subservient to established doctrinal authority.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Dragoman Journal of Translation Studies
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63132/ati.2025.theleg.8166
Primary Topic
Indonesian Legal and Regulatory Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Legitimacy of Relying on Artificial Intelligence and Its Guidelines in Determining Islamic Legal Rulings: A Jurisprudential Study

Noor Abdul-Latif, Abdul-Sattar Abd, Hussam Mohammed
Dragoman Journal of Translation Studies
Indonesian Legal and Regulatory Studies
article

The Legitimacy of Relying on Artificial Intelligence and Its Guidelines in Determining Islamic Legal Rulings: A Jurisprudential Study

Noor Abdul-Latif, Abdul-Sattar Abd, Hussam Mohammed
article en

Abstract

This study investigates the legitimacy of relying on Artificial Intelligence (AI) in deriving Islamic legal rulings (fatwas), and outlines the necessary legal, technical, and ethical safeguards. The research poses a central question: Can AI serve as an independent agent of ijtihad (Islamic legal reasoning)? Using descriptive, analytical, and comparative methodologies, the paper examines practical cases such as fatwa chatbots, automated contract systems, and forensic image analysis in Sharia contexts. The findings confirm that AI lacks the qualifications required for legal and moral accountability—such as consciousness, intention, and jurisprudential reasoning—and therefore cannot independently issue fatwas. However, AI can be employed as an auxiliary tool under strict scholarly supervision. The paper concludes with a set of comprehensive guidelines ensuring the integration of AI into Islamic jurisprudence remains subservient to established doctrinal authority.

Dragoman Journal of Translation Studies(19)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Indonesian Legal and Regulatory Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.