MACROECONOMIC DETERMINANTS OF REPUTATIONAL CAPITAL: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF DEVELOPED COUNTRIES AND BRICS COUNTRIES

In the context of global digitalization, reputational capital is becoming a key factor in the competitiveness of national economies. The purpose of the study is to identify the macroeconomic patterns of formation of reputational capital in countries with different levels of economic development. The methodological basis was based on correlation and regression analysis and econometric modeling of panel data for nine countries (USA, Germany, Great Britain, Singapore, Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa) for the period 2014–2023. The global competitiveness index was used as a proxy indicator of reputational capital, and the system of explanatory variables included indicators of digitalization, institutional development, human capital, and the business environment. The study revealed the existence of two fundamentally different trajectories of reputation capital formation. Developed countries are characterized by models with high explanatory power (average R2 = 0,906), where institutional factors play a dominant role — the fight against corruption, the protection of property rights and the effectiveness of market mechanisms. The BRICS countries demonstrate an alternative trajectory with less stable models (average R2 = 0,690) and a priority for investments in human capital. It has been revealed that technological progress can negatively affect reputational capital in the absence of an adequate institutional environment. Russia demonstrates a unique model of fragmented development with high achievements in digitalization with critical institutional constraints. The protection of property rights is a universal factor, significant for 75% of models in both groups of countries, which confirms the fundamental role of institutional guarantees. Anti-corruption policy demonstrates great importance for developed countries compared to the BRICS countries, reflecting differences in the priorities of reputational development. Human capital dominates the BRICS countries, emphasizing the importance of educational investments for emerging economies. Digitalization shows a steady positive impact in developed countries, but a mixed impact in developing economies. The patterns obtained indicate the need for a consistent approach to the development of reputational capital, taking into account the stage of the country’s institutional development.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
EKONOMIKA I UPRAVLENIE PROBLEMY RESHENIYA
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36871/ek.up.p.r.2025.06.08.010
Primary Topic
Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

MACROECONOMIC DETERMINANTS OF REPUTATIONAL CAPITAL: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF DEVELOPED COUNTRIES AND BRICS COUNTRIES

Gulnara R. Shageeva
EKONOMIKA I UPRAVLENIE PROBLEMY RESHENIYA
Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis
article

MACROECONOMIC DETERMINANTS OF REPUTATIONAL CAPITAL: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF DEVELOPED COUNTRIES AND BRICS COUNTRIES

Gulnara R. Shageeva
article en

Abstract

In the context of global digitalization, reputational capital is becoming a key factor in the competitiveness of national economies. The purpose of the study is to identify the macroeconomic patterns of formation of reputational capital in countries with different levels of economic development. The methodological basis was based on correlation and regression analysis and econometric modeling of panel data for nine countries (USA, Germany, Great Britain, Singapore, Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa) for the period 2014–2023. The global competitiveness index was used as a proxy indicator of reputational capital, and the system of explanatory variables included indicators of digitalization, institutional development, human capital, and the business environment. The study revealed the existence of two fundamentally different trajectories of reputation capital formation. Developed countries are characterized by models with high explanatory power (average R2 = 0,906), where institutional factors play a dominant role — the fight against corruption, the protection of property rights and the effectiveness of market mechanisms. The BRICS countries demonstrate an alternative trajectory with less stable models (average R2 = 0,690) and a priority for investments in human capital. It has been revealed that technological progress can negatively affect reputational capital in the absence of an adequate institutional environment. Russia demonstrates a unique model of fragmented development with high achievements in digitalization with critical institutional constraints. The protection of property rights is a universal factor, significant for 75% of models in both groups of countries, which confirms the fundamental role of institutional guarantees. Anti-corruption policy demonstrates great importance for developed countries compared to the BRICS countries, reflecting differences in the priorities of reputational development. Human capital dominates the BRICS countries, emphasizing the importance of educational investments for emerging economies. Digitalization shows a steady positive impact in developed countries, but a mixed impact in developing economies. The patterns obtained indicate the need for a consistent approach to the development of reputational capital, taking into account the stage of the country’s institutional development.

EKONOMIKA I UPRAVLENIE PROBLEMY RESHENIYAVol. 6/8(159)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.