Waiting for Specialists: A Multi‐Priority and Multi‐Speciality Analysis

Managing waiting times for specialist consultations is a critical challenge for healthcare systems worldwide. This study examines how hospitals manage outpatient specialist consultations through multi-priority systems, analysing nearly a million consultations across 29 medical specialities at a major Portuguese hospital (2010-2019). Using fixed-effects models with Driscoll-Kraay standard errors, we investigate how operational factors affect waiting times for first consultations across three priority levels. Each additional day spent in triage adds 0.52 days to urgent consultation waits (p < 0.10) but 1.41 days for routine cases (p < 0.01), demonstrating how delays cascade through the system. Staffing changes primarily benefit routine consultations, reducing waiting times by 1.88 days per additional specialist (p < 0.05). Our analysis reveals sophisticated cross-priority effects: backlogs in higher-priority cases significantly increase waiting times for lower-priority consultations, with each additional high-priority case increasing normal-priority waits by 0.15 days (p < 0.001), showing how hospitals actively protect urgent access while systematically managing delays for routine appointments. Provider-initiated cancellations disproportionately affect lower-priority cases (0.03 days, p < 0.01), whereas urgent consultations show resilience to scheduling disruptions. A 2017 policy reform reducing maximum waiting times triggered speciality-specific adaptations. Despite increased waiting times across all priority levels (p < 0.05), cardiac units implemented operational adjustments: enhanced triage efficiency (-30.88 days, p < 0.001), improved backlog management (-0.25 days, p < 0.001), and optimised capacity utilization (-0.18 days, p = 0.056). These findings show how hospitals balance clinical prioritisation with system efficiency, as speciality-specific constraints shape access outcomes. We highlight the need for targeted resource allocation and sophisticated triage systems that adapt to changing pressures while maintaining clinical priorities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The International Journal of Health Planning and Management
Published
2025-07-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.70007
Primary Topic
Primary Care and Health Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Waiting for Specialists: A Multi‐Priority and Multi‐Speciality Analysis

M. Mendes, Pedro G. Rodrigues, Maria João Bárrios
The International Journal of Health Planning and Management
Primary Care and Health Outcomes
article

Waiting for Specialists: A Multi‐Priority and Multi‐Speciality Analysis

M. Mendes, Pedro G. Rodrigues, Maria João Bárrios
article en

Abstract

Managing waiting times for specialist consultations is a critical challenge for healthcare systems worldwide. This study examines how hospitals manage outpatient specialist consultations through multi-priority systems, analysing nearly a million consultations across 29 medical specialities at a major Portuguese hospital (2010-2019). Using fixed-effects models with Driscoll-Kraay standard errors, we investigate how operational factors affect waiting times for first consultations across three priority levels. Each additional day spent in triage adds 0.52 days to urgent consultation waits (p < 0.10) but 1.41 days for routine cases (p < 0.01), demonstrating how delays cascade through the system. Staffing changes primarily benefit routine consultations, reducing waiting times by 1.88 days per additional specialist (p < 0.05). Our analysis reveals sophisticated cross-priority effects: backlogs in higher-priority cases significantly increase waiting times for lower-priority consultations, with each additional high-priority case increasing normal-priority waits by 0.15 days (p < 0.001), showing how hospitals actively protect urgent access while systematically managing delays for routine appointments. Provider-initiated cancellations disproportionately affect lower-priority cases (0.03 days, p < 0.01), whereas urgent consultations show resilience to scheduling disruptions. A 2017 policy reform reducing maximum waiting times triggered speciality-specific adaptations. Despite increased waiting times across all priority levels (p < 0.05), cardiac units implemented operational adjustments: enhanced triage efficiency (-30.88 days, p < 0.001), improved backlog management (-0.25 days, p < 0.001), and optimised capacity utilization (-0.18 days, p = 0.056). These findings show how hospitals balance clinical prioritisation with system efficiency, as speciality-specific constraints shape access outcomes. We highlight the need for targeted resource allocation and sophisticated triage systems that adapt to changing pressures while maintaining clinical priorities.

The International Journal of Health Planning and ManagementVol. 40(6)
University of Lisbon (PT), Lusíada University of Lisbon (PT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Primary Care and Health Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.