“It has to somehow permeate to the public”: expert views on the solidaristic potential of Israel’s National genomic biobank initiative

Abstract The 2018 Digital Health Initiative (DHI) implemented by Israel included the establishment of a national biobank. Establishing a national biobank was clouded in ample rhetoric of solidarity promising scientific and economic progress, and financial benefits. To assess the potential of these promises, we conducted 15 semi-structured interviews with experts with a management, health or political background from Israel over a one-year period. Applying a data solidarity framework to the insights gained from the interviews, we concluded that a national biobank indeed offers great potential for medical progress under the condition that data use is transparent and mechanisms for access are clear. In contrast, we estimate that claims on economic and financial benefits are less certain and depend on controversial ideas like the trickle-down effect. To strengthen the beneficial effects of a national biobank, we recommend policymakers adhere to data solidarity to avoid misappropriating solidarity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Theory & Health
Published
2025-07-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41285-025-00222-z
Primary Topic
Ethics in Clinical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“It has to somehow permeate to the public”: expert views on the solidaristic potential of Israel’s National genomic biobank initiative

Elias Weiss, Yael Hashiloni‐Dolev, Aviad E. Raz, Tamar Nov‐Klaiman
Social Theory & Health
Ethics in Clinical Research
article

“It has to somehow permeate to the public”: expert views on the solidaristic potential of Israel’s National genomic biobank initiative

Elias Weiss, Yael Hashiloni‐Dolev, Aviad E. Raz, Tamar Nov‐Klaiman
article en

Abstract

Abstract The 2018 Digital Health Initiative (DHI) implemented by Israel included the establishment of a national biobank. Establishing a national biobank was clouded in ample rhetoric of solidarity promising scientific and economic progress, and financial benefits. To assess the potential of these promises, we conducted 15 semi-structured interviews with experts with a management, health or political background from Israel over a one-year period. Applying a data solidarity framework to the insights gained from the interviews, we concluded that a national biobank indeed offers great potential for medical progress under the condition that data use is transparent and mechanisms for access are clear. In contrast, we estimate that claims on economic and financial benefits are less certain and depend on controversial ideas like the trickle-down effect. To strengthen the beneficial effects of a national biobank, we recommend policymakers adhere to data solidarity to avoid misappropriating solidarity.

Social Theory & HealthVol. 23(1)
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev (IL), University of Vienna (AT), University of Augsburg (DE)
Universität Wien
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Ethics in Clinical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.