Quantitative estimation of disposition index from postprandial glucose data across the spectrum of glucose tolerance

Disposition index (DI), defined as the product of insulin sensitivity and β-cell responsivity, is the best measure of β-cell function. This is usually assessed from plasma glucose and insulin, and sometimes C-peptide, data either from surrogate indices or model-based methods. However, the recent advent of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems in non-insulin-treated individuals raises the possibility of its quantification in outpatients. As a first step, we propose a method to assess DI from glucose concentration data only and validated it against the oral minimal model (OMM). To do so, we used data from two clinical dataset with mixed meal tolerance test (MTT) studies in non-insulin-treated individuals: the first consisted of 14 individuals with type 2 diabetes studied twice, either after receiving a DPP-4 inhibitor or a placebo before the meal, whereas the second consisted of 62 individuals with and without pre- or type 2 diabetes. A third, simulated, dataset consisted of 100 virtual subjects from the Padova Type 2 Diabetes Simulator was used for additional tests. Plasma glucose, insulin, and C-peptide concentrations were used to estimate the reference DI from the OMM (DI<sup>MM</sup>), whereas glucose data only were used to calculate the proposed DI (DI<sup>G</sup>). DI<sup>G</sup> was well correlated with DI<sup>MM</sup> in both the clinical and simulated datasets (<i>R</i> between 0.88 and 0.79, <i>P</i> < 0.001), and exhibited the same between-visit or between-group pattern. DI<sup>G</sup> can be used to assess therapy effectiveness and degree of glucose tolerance using glucose data only, paving the way to potentially assess β-cell function in real-life conditions using CGM.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> The advent of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in non-insulin-treated individuals raises the possibility of quantifying disposition index (DI), a key metric of β-cell function usually assessed in research settings, in outpatients. A method for DI estimation from postprandial glucose data only (DI<sup>G</sup>) was developed and validated against a reference. DI<sup>G</sup> can be used to assess therapy effectiveness and degree of glucose tolerance in non-insulin-treated individuals, paving the way for its quantification in real-life conditions from CGM devices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism
Published
2025-07-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpendo.00407.2024
Primary Topic
Diabetes Management and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantitative estimation of disposition index from postprandial glucose data across the spectrum of glucose tolerance

Adrian Vella, Michele Schiavon, Chiara Dalla Man
American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism
Diabetes Management and Research
article

Quantitative estimation of disposition index from postprandial glucose data across the spectrum of glucose tolerance

Adrian Vella, Michele Schiavon, Chiara Dalla Man
article en

Abstract

Disposition index (DI), defined as the product of insulin sensitivity and β-cell responsivity, is the best measure of β-cell function. This is usually assessed from plasma glucose and insulin, and sometimes C-peptide, data either from surrogate indices or model-based methods. However, the recent advent of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems in non-insulin-treated individuals raises the possibility of its quantification in outpatients. As a first step, we propose a method to assess DI from glucose concentration data only and validated it against the oral minimal model (OMM). To do so, we used data from two clinical dataset with mixed meal tolerance test (MTT) studies in non-insulin-treated individuals: the first consisted of 14 individuals with type 2 diabetes studied twice, either after receiving a DPP-4 inhibitor or a placebo before the meal, whereas the second consisted of 62 individuals with and without pre- or type 2 diabetes. A third, simulated, dataset consisted of 100 virtual subjects from the Padova Type 2 Diabetes Simulator was used for additional tests. Plasma glucose, insulin, and C-peptide concentrations were used to estimate the reference DI from the OMM (DI<sup>MM</sup>), whereas glucose data only were used to calculate the proposed DI (DI<sup>G</sup>). DI<sup>G</sup> was well correlated with DI<sup>MM</sup> in both the clinical and simulated datasets (<i>R</i> between 0.88 and 0.79, <i>P</i> < 0.001), and exhibited the same between-visit or between-group pattern. DI<sup>G</sup> can be used to assess therapy effectiveness and degree of glucose tolerance using glucose data only, paving the way to potentially assess β-cell function in real-life conditions using CGM.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> The advent of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in non-insulin-treated individuals raises the possibility of quantifying disposition index (DI), a key metric of β-cell function usually assessed in research settings, in outpatients. A method for DI estimation from postprandial glucose data only (DI<sup>G</sup>) was developed and validated against a reference. DI<sup>G</sup> can be used to assess therapy effectiveness and degree of glucose tolerance in non-insulin-treated individuals, paving the way for its quantification in real-life conditions from CGM devices.

American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and MetabolismVol. 329(2)
Mayo Clinic (US), University of Padua (IT)
Ministero dell'Università e della Ricerca, National Institutes of Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Diabetes Management and Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.